2.0T & 3.0T Differences
06-21-2013, 07:04 PM
#12
AudiWorld Super User
Looking at the charts, I don't see where at any RPM and HP point where the 2.0 has more torque than the 3.0.
I've seen these charts mapped for the older 3.2 non-supercharged engine vs the 2.0 where there were points where the 2.0 had more torque.
I've seen these charts mapped for the older 3.2 non-supercharged engine vs the 2.0 where there were points where the 2.0 had more torque.
Last edited by snagitseven; 06-21-2013 at 07:08 PM.
06-21-2013, 07:12 PM
#13
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it is for 2013
Summary: Audi: would have harsh 1-2 upshifts when accelerating or harsh downshifts when braking, to address both concerns, new software calibration for transmission is available. Models 2013 a4, a5, a5 cabriolet, allroad, q5, a6/a7, a8, a8l.
Summary: Audi: would have harsh 1-2 upshifts when accelerating or harsh downshifts when braking, to address both concerns, new software calibration for transmission is available. Models 2013 a4, a5, a5 cabriolet, allroad, q5, a6/a7, a8, a8l.
06-22-2013, 02:51 AM
#15
AudiWorld Member
I wish manufacturers would get that some people want all the bells and whistles, but still want and economical ride. I would opt for the 2.0 if I could get the Prestige and Ann the options, sure the 3.0 is a blast to drive, but for 14900 miles out of the 15000 miles I drive a year the 2.0 would be fine.
06-22-2013, 08:00 AM
#16
Your comment reminds me of something I learned a long while ago. Many years ago when I bought my first house my father in law took me to the basement to explain the hot air heat/AC system. He pointed to two ducts attached to the furnace unit at opposite sides and said: “See these? One sucks, the other one blows.” I have learned over the years that this little bit of wisdom applies to many of life’s situations and things, human and otherwise. My two cents. lol
Last edited by irenesbob; 06-22-2013 at 08:44 AM.
06-22-2013, 04:25 PM
#17
AudiWorld Member
It applies to the ventilation seats. European sucks and blows, American just blows. LOL.
03-04-2015, 12:47 PM
#18
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Near Baltimore MD
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had a 2.0 loaner for a few days...decent car for everyday driving but 3.0's acceleration especially at highway speeds is noticeably better.
For driving enthusiast the 3.0 would be a better fit.
For driving enthusiast the 3.0 would be a better fit.
03-04-2015, 01:39 PM
#19
In terms of power:
The 2016 A6 2.0 Q Tip P+: 252 HP 5,000 to 6,000 rpm and 273 lb-ft of torque from 1,600 to 4,500 rpm
The 2016 A6 3.0 TFSI P+: 333HP 5,500 to 6,500 rpm and 325 lb/ft of torque 2,900 to 5,300 rpm
03-04-2015, 04:21 PM
#20
AudiWorld Super User
FWIW – the AoA configurator for the 2016 A6 shows the 2.0 with 0-60 time of 5.8 seconds with the newly stronger 2.0 four. This is quicker than the 6.7 seconds shown for previous versions. For the 2016 3.0 supercharged TFSI car the 0-60 time is shown as 5.1 seconds. The gap between 3.0 and 2.0 has narrowed.
In terms of power:
The 2016 A6 2.0 Q Tip P+: 252 HP 5,000 to 6,000 rpm and 273 lb-ft of torque from 1,600 to 4,500 rpm
The 2016 A6 3.0 TFSI P+: 333HP 5,500 to 6,500 rpm and 325 lb/ft of torque 2,900 to 5,300 rpm
In terms of power:
The 2016 A6 2.0 Q Tip P+: 252 HP 5,000 to 6,000 rpm and 273 lb-ft of torque from 1,600 to 4,500 rpm
The 2016 A6 3.0 TFSI P+: 333HP 5,500 to 6,500 rpm and 325 lb/ft of torque 2,900 to 5,300 rpm