Notices
A6 (C7 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C7 Audi A6 produced from 2011 - 2017

New brake rotors at 11k miles? Really??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2016, 01:28 PM
  #11  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
thedjm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2014a6tdi
I got the same word from Audi Palo Alto. They told me my brakes were "glazed" and deglazed them gratis (fronts). Started making noise on the rears and they said they were glazed too and were unwilling to do anything. Said I "overheated them" or "didn't use them enough". Replacement was the only suggestion because they "only" have 6mm left on them.

So (their professional opinion):
1) either I use my brakes too much or don't use them enough
2) At 6mm they recommend replacement

I did everything I could to get new brakes, free. Didn't happen and I'll be damned if I'm replacing brake pads with 6mm remaining. Thus, for now, I announce my arrival with a loud squeal at low brake pressure. Makes it easy for the kids and wife to know I'm home, so there's that.
Thanks for the confirmation that I'm dealing with crooks.
My pads are at 9mm and other than the "scoring" they say my brakes look brand new. Of course they do. It's a brand new car with 15K miles on it.

Logically, brakes that are otherwise brand new but have some kind of defect causing vibration at 10-15K miles would be taken care of by the company that stands behind their product.
Old 04-18-2016, 01:29 PM
  #12  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
thedjm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Barrels41
The pad use should remove corrosion. Do you drive on unpaved roads, sand, gravel? Coal mines? Inspect the rotors with an indy mechanic if you cannot jack it up and set it safely on jackstands to DIY. Might there be a problem in the anti-lock brake system? Do not use a dealer for non-warranty work. Unless you run a hedge fund.
This is a commuter car that doesn't see much action. No tracking, no four-wheeling. Just back and forth to work with the occasional weekend trip.
If it comes to it you can bet Audi won't be seeing a penny for the cost to repair.
Old 04-18-2016, 01:47 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
2014a6tdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thedjm
Thanks for the confirmation that I'm dealing with crooks.
My pads are at 9mm and other than the "scoring" they say my brakes look brand new. Of course they do. It's a brand new car with 15K miles on it.

Logically, brakes that are otherwise brand new but have some kind of defect causing vibration at 10-15K miles would be taken care of by the company that stands behind their product.
Crooks isn't the word I'd use. Indifferent is probably the word I'd use. Same experience with Audi Burlingame. The truth is that these brakes are noisy and have some longevity problems versus something you might find on, say, a Lexus. Is that because they are more performance oriented or otherwise? Couldn't say, but, its easily my #1 complaint with this car and their shoulder shrug attitude about it was offputting. Otherwise I've been very happy with my A6.
Old 04-23-2016, 05:56 PM
  #14  
AudiWorld Member
 
jr'sAudiA6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I would strongly recommend that everyone become informed about disk brakes by reading the article Tenspeed references in post # 4. It really irks me no end to see post after post of owners complaining to their dealer about noisy brakes or a brake associated vibration and the dealer solution is to replace perfectly good rotors. It is extremely rare for a brake rotor to actually warp. Corrosion and scored rotors after only 11K I doubt it. The solid rotors that come on the A6 can easily be turned on a brake lathe to remove any brake pad deposition that has occurred. The wear tolerance on the brake rotors is the original thickness minus 2mm. I seriously doubt the rotors are any where near the minimum thickness.
Old 04-27-2016, 02:29 PM
  #15  
AudiWorld Member
 
OldSchool24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 72
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

This is insane. There is no way that the owner of a 2016 A6 with 11K miles should be responsible for defective/low quality brakes.

A different issue, but my 2014 A6 rear rotor hats started started to rust within a month of picking up the new car. Three years later and the rear rotor hats are completely covered in rust, the edges of the rotors are completely rusted, and the calipers (especially the rear calipers) are about 50% covered in rust. So basically, the rest of my car looks brand new and then you look through the spokes of the wheels and the car looks like I bought it in 1988. Yes, I live in a city with snow and salt, but relative to other (less expensive) cars I have owned in the past, the A6 brakes rusted much quicker.

In fact, I was at the local Audi dealership last week and the 2016 A7 that was on display in the showroom had rotor hats that were about 5% covered in rust! Brand new and stored inside, but rusting already. Come on, Audi. Who wants to spend $60K - $80K on a new car that starts rusting before you even drive it off the lot?
Old 04-27-2016, 04:12 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
DanfZX14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,655
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OldSchool24
This is insane. There is no way that the owner of a 2016 A6 with 11K miles should be responsible for defective/low quality brakes.

A different issue, but my 2014 A6 rear rotor hats started started to rust within a month of picking up the new car. Three years later and the rear rotor hats are completely covered in rust, the edges of the rotors are completely rusted, and the calipers (especially the rear calipers) are about 50% covered in rust. So basically, the rest of my car looks brand new and then you look through the spokes of the wheels and the car looks like I bought it in 1988. Yes, I live in a city with snow and salt, but relative to other (less expensive) cars I have owned in the past, the A6 brakes rusted much quicker.

In fact, I was at the local Audi dealership last week and the 2016 A7 that was on display in the showroom had rotor hats that were about 5% covered in rust! Brand new and stored inside, but rusting already. Come on, Audi. Who wants to spend $60K - $80K on a new car that starts rusting before you even drive it off the lot?
Must be our polluted American atmosphere causing it of which there is none of in Germany/Europe. Best I can come up with!
Old 04-29-2016, 12:13 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
r1racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'm at 56k and have yet to change mine and I'm a demon on the brakes...just waiting for my rotors to arrive. No way you need new rotors at 11k unless they are somehow damaged or warped.
Old 07-19-2016, 09:46 AM
  #18  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
LeadingEdge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry to be the OP who never updates the post. Better late than never. But AoA did come through a few days after I posted and authorized replacing rotors only (no pads) under warranty as a "one-time exception". I went ahead and replaced pads also, since no extra labor cost during the rotor replacement. It's been about 5k miles since then with no problems.

Like OldSchool24, I too noticed that the surface of my original rotors were rusty within a few thousand miles of purchasing (new). Often driving the car would clear off the rust, say on the way to work, then rotor surface would look rusty again by the end of the work day. This was before I noticed any vibrations. With the new rotors, no issue like that. I haven't studied them closely, but I haven't noticed anything.

Thanks for all the replies, and I definitely would have gone to an indy mechanic to turn the rotors if AoA hadn't paid for the replacement.
Old 07-19-2016, 11:31 AM
  #19  
AudiWorld Member
 
Silver42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Rears - 48kMi on Odo
Fronts 51kMi on Odo

Something is amiss with an 11kMi swap I would have to say.
Old 07-19-2016, 03:51 PM
  #20  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
DanfZX14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,655
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I'm going to throw something else into the mix I've noticed. When using ACC it feels like the rear brakes are used predominately to control the speed of the car. Now I know from my experience with my wife's Infiniti G37XS and dealing with my Indy mechanic that modern cars with traction, stability control, etc wear out rear brakes before fronts because of these safety features. What I'm wondering is if on a vehicle with ACC if it is predispositioned to burn up the rear brakes even quicker? For me only time will tell as I use ACC a real lot.

Last edited by DanfZX14; 07-19-2016 at 03:55 PM.


Quick Reply: New brake rotors at 11k miles? Really??



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM.