A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C6 Audi A6 produced from 2004-present and Audi S6 produced from 2007 - 2011

3.2l timing chain replacement avoidable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2016, 03:12 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
John Elway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3.2l timing chain replacement avoidable?

As the title states, is it avoidable through following the proper maintenance schedule? Or is it going to happen and it's just a matter of time?
Old 09-18-2016, 08:43 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Member
 
LarryJa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sicklerville, NJ 08081
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

It will happen in time. However, with timely, good oil maintenance/changes, that time may be at 200k miles. I just heard of a 4.2fsi that went 250k miles on all original chains & tensioners
Old 09-18-2016, 11:14 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
raj99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,447
Received 201 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Elway
As the title states, is it avoidable through following the proper maintenance schedule? Or is it going to happen and it's just a matter of time?
Everything that moves can wear out and a timing chain can last a VERY long time, it really does depend on maintenance and a good amount of luck. The chain itself doesn't fail too often, but what will fail is items the chain depends on (i.e. guides).
Old 09-18-2016, 02:53 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
KevinGary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 9,687
Received 881 Likes on 720 Posts
Default

I was the original owner of a 2005. I changed the oil every 5,000 miles and was meticulous with having it serviced at the dealer. Despite this care, the tensioners and the guides failed around 135k miles. These parts are made out of plastic and have a limited life expectancy. By the way, at 135k miles the chain had zero stretch.
The following users liked this post:
Queenb253 (08-12-2023)
Old 09-19-2016, 02:32 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Member
 
jujuC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Same here, my guides went 3yrs ago and chain was fine at the time ~130k. I have put around 45k miles after top guides were replaced with no signs of problems so far.
Old 09-19-2016, 08:26 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
A6Gary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 6,827
Received 170 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Even though the chain guides are a thermoplastic, they should last as long as the piston rings, valve guides, camshaft bearings, and main bearings, IMHO. If a primary engine part fails prematurely such as these guides, then I would maintain the part and/or the lubrication system is not designed properly to have the same design life as the other main engine parts. It would also appear that the majority of the failed guides discussed on the forums are the upper chain guides, which would indicated some other contributing condition leading to failure.
Old 09-20-2016, 01:43 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Member
 
LarryJa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sicklerville, NJ 08081
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

While the upper timing chain guides are a weak point on these engines, they seem to fail sooner if the relayed tensioners start losing oil "draining down" while the car sits, typically overnight. That's when we'll get the startup "clatter".
Once the startup clatter begins occurring, the upper chain guides get beat up & fail.
The tensioner leak down is caused by poor oil maintenance & subsequent tensioner wear.
Therefore, particularly attentive oil maintenance will support longer tensioner & guide life.
My '06 3.2 C6 (w/162k miles) has a steady 7.5 degrees of deviation on it's driver's side cam bank & half that on the passenger side. I've been motitoring it for the last 12k miles that I've owned the car. I have no startup clatter, at all.
I will also admit that I've already bought all the tools specifically needed to do an upper tensioner replacement. Someday, I will need to use them.
I just took a 1200 mile vacation trip with the car & had prepared to replace that bank 2 upper tensioner in a couple of weeks. However, since my vcds readings continue to be steady, I've postponed that repair for now. (Instead, I will be removing & having the intermittently faulting abs controller repaired)
So, in conclusion, I've seen that especially vigilant oil maintenance does prolong the life of these engines' upper timing chain tensioners & guides. That has been the collective wisdom on this forum for quite some time.
Their failure is fairly common, & because the 4.2's require engine removal for their replacement, I avoided buying a 4.2, which is what I originally lusted for. :-(

Last edited by LarryJa; 09-20-2016 at 01:48 AM.
Old 09-20-2016, 12:28 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
jujuC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LarryJa
While the upper timing chain guides are a weak point on these engines, they seem to fail sooner if the relayed tensioners start losing oil "draining down" while the car sits, typically overnight. That's when we'll get the startup "clatter".
Once the startup clatter begins occurring, the upper chain guides get beat up & fail.
The tensioner leak down is caused by poor oil maintenance & subsequent tensioner wear.
Therefore, particularly attentive oil maintenance will support longer tensioner & guide life.
My '06 3.2 C6 (w/162k miles) has a steady 7.5 degrees of deviation on it's driver's side cam bank & half that on the passenger side. I've been motitoring it for the last 12k miles that I've owned the car. I have no startup clatter, at all.
I will also admit that I've already bought all the tools specifically needed to do an upper tensioner replacement. Someday, I will need to use them.
I just took a 1200 mile vacation trip with the car & had prepared to replace that bank 2 upper tensioner in a couple of weeks. However, since my vcds readings continue to be steady, I've postponed that repair for now. (Instead, I will be removing & having the intermittently faulting abs controller repaired)
So, in conclusion, I've seen that especially vigilant oil maintenance does prolong the life of these engines' upper timing chain tensioners & guides. That has been the collective wisdom on this forum for quite some time.
Their failure is fairly common, & because the 4.2's require engine removal for their replacement, I avoided buying a 4.2, which is what I originally lusted for. :-(
Good to know, thanks. What's the process with VAG to monitor the tensioners? Got 40k on my C7 and when it sits for more than 3 to 4 days it clatters very briefly at start up (⊙.☉) should I worry? On my C6 oil changes at around every 5k but it still happened to me like most of us here. I lean towards poor design as main cause.
Old 09-20-2016, 06:23 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
beep-beep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,600
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LarryJa
While the upper timing chain guides are a weak point on these engines, they seem to fail sooner if the relayed tensioners start losing oil "draining down" while the car sits, typically overnight. That's when we'll get the startup "clatter".
Once the startup clatter begins occurring, the upper chain guides get beat up & fail.
The tensioner leak down is caused by poor oil maintenance & subsequent tensioner wear.
Therefore, particularly attentive oil maintenance will support longer tensioner & guide life.
My '06 3.2 C6 (w/162k miles) has a steady 7.5 degrees of deviation on it's driver's side cam bank & half that on the passenger side. I've been motitoring it for the last 12k miles that I've owned the car. I have no startup clatter, at all.
I will also admit that I've already bought all the tools specifically needed to do an upper tensioner replacement. Someday, I will need to use them.
I just took a 1200 mile vacation trip with the car & had prepared to replace that bank 2 upper tensioner in a couple of weeks. However, since my vcds readings continue to be steady, I've postponed that repair for now. (Instead, I will be removing & having the intermittently faulting abs controller repaired)
So, in conclusion, I've seen that especially vigilant oil maintenance does prolong the life of these engines' upper timing chain tensioners & guides. That has been the collective wisdom on this forum for quite some time.
Their failure is fairly common, & because the 4.2's require engine removal for their replacement, I avoided buying a 4.2, which is what I originally lusted for. :-(
Maybe it just my feeling, but I think the tentioners start loosing oil sooner if people drive off in the car right after starting up. Without giving engine a second to pump oil though the tentioners.

Otherwise it sounds like very reliably and simple way to deal with it: the chatter started - change tentioners. You do not have to warry about it the rest of the time.
Old 09-20-2016, 06:25 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Member
 
LarryJa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sicklerville, NJ 08081
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Actually, I'm leaning toward it being a poor material choice for guides. Apparently, the plastic chosen for the guides is not durable enough for it's job.

In Ross Tech vcds,the engine module measuring block #93 provides the deviation, from ideal, for each of the four cams. You sum the readings of both cams in each bank. The readings are in degrees & the acceptable service limit is 8 degrees for each bank.

That should get you a start. :-)


Quick Reply: 3.2l timing chain replacement avoidable?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:58 AM.