A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C6 Audi A6 produced from 2004-present and Audi S6 produced from 2007 - 2011

New to Me 05 A6.....Intro and progress

Old 10-07-2014, 06:03 PM
  #11  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm looking forward to testing this one. The other two are toy cars, so no big loss there.
Old 10-08-2014, 10:50 AM
  #12  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not good. Been working on it. Rotating the motor around by hand, and the drivers side cams were skipping just rolling it over by hand. Got them around, locked down, phasers removed, and passenger side was off. Dropped a rod down into #1 and when I lined up the cams, the rod had dropped probably 1" into the head. So passenger side was out too. I don't have high hopes at this point for it being a quick clean fix. Gotta get the crank locked before I try to bust the cam phasers free on the passenger side.
Old 10-08-2014, 12:56 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Both tensioners out, cams locked, Crank is as close to TDC as I can make it using the rod down the spark plug hole "technique", lol.

Drivers side tensioner was completely trashed. Piston completely sunk in bore, no tension at all, guides torn up or missing (fished one from down low).

Passenger side tensioner was in good shape, but strangely, passenger side seems to be the side that was off also. Both cams were about 1/8 turn or so off from the front piston on the passenger side being at TDC.

I'm hesitant to go further. I'd need to put the new tensioners in and line everything up in order to compression test, but that runs the risk of having to recompress and potentially trash the new tensioners if I end up doing a pull. I didn't do a compression test prior simply for the fact that I didn't want to potentially bend valves in the first place.

The good news, or bad news possibly, is that when I was rotating the motor over by hand, I was not getting any resistant spots. I guess I'm still hoping it was close enough to being in time that nothing it. Looking back at the previous pictures, the way the cams are sitting, if I'd have simply backed up the motor about 1/4 of a turn, I'd have gotten the cams all lined up together very potentially in time. BUT, that would have been contingent of IF tension was maintained on the chains which it wasn't.

Will get some pics up shortly.

I guess what I'm going to shoot for at this point is grabbing a long 6mm allen socket, and pinning the crank at TDC, then go back together as-is for a compression test and take my chances on the tensioners. If the compression test comes back bad, then I'll probably just yank the motor and go through it.

For those of you who HAVE replaced valves on these, did you end up having to have new guides pressed in or were they within tolerances?
Old 10-08-2014, 03:53 PM
  #14  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ok, here's pics:

Passenger side cams locked.



I had to use the tool to hold the phasers to keep the crank from turning. Worked well.

Drivers side cams locked. These were in time by what the rod in #1 was telling me:



Back of Passenger head.



Back of driver head:



Lots of room to work with, that's for sure.

Here's the tensioners:



Passenger on top obviously. The drivers side one the piston is COMPLETELY compressed and not coming out.

Now what's got me REALLY perplexed. Looking at the intake cam for the passenger side head, you can't see the lobes, I.E. it doesn't look like the rockers are on the base circle of the cam. Yet, this is supposed to be the TDC servicing position for the cams. I find this odd considering #1 is supposed to be at TDC yet it looks like the #1 intake valves are very close to if not open to a degree.

Last edited by Fastbird; 10-08-2014 at 03:55 PM.
Old 10-08-2014, 04:04 PM
  #15  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Now here's where I'm struggling. Going back to the following two pics below, you'll see the Passenger side head (top) and drivers side head (bottom) right after I got the car home and the valve covers off.





Looking at the relative position of the screw holes for the cams, would you guys agree that the cams themselves were in time together? To me it looks like if I backed the motor up just a bit, the four cams would have been able to be locked in with the tools without any adjusting. But once I rotated the motor around by hand they got out of whack ALTHOUGH, no resistance was met moving around by hand. So I'm left wondering if A, due to the nature of how the crank pulls on the chain from the bottom for the drivers side, if things remained in time and just got out while cranking by hand, or B, if it already bent valves and hence, I was met with no resistance.

Still doesn't explain why the Passenger side cams were BEHIND the crank in reference to #1 TDC though. I rolled the cams to upright by hand and watched the rod drop into the #1 spark plug well as I did. Backed them out about 1/5 of a turn or so and the rod came back to TDC (Drivers side chain/tensioner/phasers were already apart at this point).
Old 10-08-2014, 05:38 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Member
 
FL C6.5 Avant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Coastal Florida
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default not sure I can offer a lot at this point, but....

...thanks for the photo essay. great stuff.
yeah that driver's side tensioner is trash. will be interesting to do some forensics on it if you can.
couldn't you check for bent valves by doing a compressed air leakdown?
might cause the crank to move....
my gut says you haven't bent anything but take that as pure speculation.

Have you seen this service trainer? has a section on the 3.2 fsi.
not sure there's any golden nuggets, but might help?
Attached Files
Old 10-08-2014, 05:54 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FL C6.5 Avant
...thanks for the photo essay. great stuff.
yeah that driver's side tensioner is trash. will be interesting to do some forensics on it if you can.
couldn't you check for bent valves by doing a compressed air leakdown?
might cause the crank to move....
my gut says you haven't bent anything but take that as pure speculation.

Have you seen this service trainer? has a section on the 3.2 fsi.
not sure there's any golden nuggets, but might help?
I can do a compression test, but I'll have to install the new tensioners and make sure timing is set prior to that. I'm hesitant to do that because if I've got to dig back into it, then tensioners run the risk of damage if I have to hand recompress them. Unfortunately it looks like that will be the risk I have to take. I'm expecting delivery of the new tensioners either late this week or early next week.

I'm really confused as to why the cams on the passenger side were retarded in relation to the #1 piston at TDC. That side seemed fine. *Edit* UNLESS.......the cam phasers retarded the cams when the problem first presented itself. That thought just struck me.

Last edited by Fastbird; 10-08-2014 at 05:57 PM.
Old 10-08-2014, 06:02 PM
  #18  
AudiWorld Member
 
FL C6.5 Avant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Coastal Florida
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my thought was compression test requires "many" engine revolutions.
compressed air leakdown doesn't make you spin the crank (other than what the air pressure in the cyl does). you could do the leakdown before putting the tensioners in.
i think it's entirely possible that the ecu told one bank of phasors to adjust relative to the other. I think the service trainer had a blurb somewhere in there about that?
Old 10-09-2014, 06:27 AM
  #19  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
Fastbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Only problem with a leakdown test....well, actually there's a couple. One, I don't have a set of leakdown gauges amazingly. But on top of that, there's no chains on the cams at this point, so just rotating the cams around to close the valves won't work as the crank is stationary (and unpinned, so air pressure would force the crank around too, which is not what I want).

I'm going out to try to pin the crank a little later today, but I'm fuzzy on one thing. Can it be pinned in multiple positions, or is there only ONE point that it can be pinned, that being #1 TDC?
Old 10-09-2014, 09:00 AM
  #20  
AudiWorld Member
 
FL C6.5 Avant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Coastal Florida
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fastbird
Only problem with a leakdown test....well, actually there's a couple. One, I don't have a set of leakdown gauges amazingly. But on top of that, there's no chains on the cams at this point, so just rotating the cams around to close the valves won't work as the crank is stationary (and unpinned, so air pressure would force the crank around too, which is not what I want).

I'm going out to try to pin the crank a little later today, but I'm fuzzy on one thing. Can it be pinned in multiple positions, or is there only ONE point that it can be pinned, that being #1 TDC?
are you talking about pinning via the side of the block into the crank throw?
if so, then (i know you know this, but....) you will pin the crank in a unique position, which i believe to be #1 TDC (but I'm away from the service manual). but the "cam timing" (chains are off) could be 0 or 180 relative to #1 depending on compression vs. exhaust stroke.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: New to Me 05 A6.....Intro and progress



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.