Q5 Ride Quality?
#21
AudiWorld Senior Member
From certain angles they are very similar we noticed that right away. The new Q5 will be more angular than the current gen which admittedly is getting dated after 8 model years. We'd buy an other Q5 if it weren't coming from the new plant in Mexico.
#22
AudiWorld Senior Member
The pricing doesn't remain reasonable for long when you start adding options, but I was somewhat prepared for it. I'm a 2.0t buyer so for me the GLC isn't a step down by any means. You're correct, they are only offering that engine initially. Others to follow I guess.
#23
AudiWorld Member
The little research I did suggests that the top of the current line is around $51K. Not that far from a Q5 2.0T Prestige and similarly equipped. But I didn't look that hard past the MB site.
#24
AudiWorld Senior Member
The dash mounted screen isn't my favorite look either, but not a deal breaker. Our other car has one and I've gotten used to it. The new gen A4 and Allroad have it so I'm guessing the next gen Q5 will too. A sign of the times I guess. On some Audi's with it, it's retractable, not sure about A4, Allroad etc.
#25
I drove a new X3 and a 2013 Q5 (that the BMW dealer had on the used lot). I think the issue is I am expecting (maybe naively) an SUV to ride closely to the way my A5 does. Both the X3 and Q5 are definitely more bouncy. I would say the X3 runflats make sharp bumps feel harder. But overall I would not say the X3 was any more "bouncy" than the Q5.
#26
In terms of ride quality. I driving a dealer loaner 3.0T with 19" wheels. Yes, it feels a little more stable and firmer... but some of that could be the 103k miles on out 2.0T suspension. But on broken roads, its' a deal braker. I don;t know how someone could have the 21's on the SQ5 in a place without near perfect roads. No way that a fair trade off just for something primarily cosmetic.
For the primary function of this car, the 18's are the way to go IMO. Sure, they aren't as pretty, but it's not a huge difference anyway. At some point the lower profile wheels just make it look more like a hatchback with awkward proportions instead of a near-mid sized SUV.
As for the performance of the 3.0T. Yes, much stronger above 70mph, but who cares? Below that the 150lb weight disadvantage makes it a wash with the torquey 2.0T.
It also made me realize how well out 2011 is holding up. The transmission isn't suite as smooth as the new car, but it's very close. Not a big different in rattles and squeaks.
For the primary function of this car, the 18's are the way to go IMO. Sure, they aren't as pretty, but it's not a huge difference anyway. At some point the lower profile wheels just make it look more like a hatchback with awkward proportions instead of a near-mid sized SUV.
As for the performance of the 3.0T. Yes, much stronger above 70mph, but who cares? Below that the 150lb weight disadvantage makes it a wash with the torquey 2.0T.
It also made me realize how well out 2011 is holding up. The transmission isn't suite as smooth as the new car, but it's very close. Not a big different in rattles and squeaks.
#28
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In terms of ride quality. I driving a dealer loaner 3.0T with 19" wheels. Yes, it feels a little more stable and firmer... but some of that could be the 103k miles on out 2.0T suspension. But on broken roads, its' a deal braker. I don;t know how someone could have the 21's on the SQ5 in a place without near perfect roads. No way that a fair trade off just for something primarily cosmetic.
For the primary function of this car, the 18's are the way to go IMO. Sure, they aren't as pretty, but it's not a huge difference anyway. At some point the lower profile wheels just make it look more like a hatchback with awkward proportions instead of a near-mid sized SUV.
As for the performance of the 3.0T. Yes, much stronger above 70mph, but who cares? Below that the 150lb weight disadvantage makes it a wash with the torquey 2.0T.
It also made me realize how well out 2011 is holding up. The transmission isn't suite as smooth as the new car, but it's very close. Not a big different in rattles and squeaks.
For the primary function of this car, the 18's are the way to go IMO. Sure, they aren't as pretty, but it's not a huge difference anyway. At some point the lower profile wheels just make it look more like a hatchback with awkward proportions instead of a near-mid sized SUV.
As for the performance of the 3.0T. Yes, much stronger above 70mph, but who cares? Below that the 150lb weight disadvantage makes it a wash with the torquey 2.0T.
It also made me realize how well out 2011 is holding up. The transmission isn't suite as smooth as the new car, but it's very close. Not a big different in rattles and squeaks.
As for not understanding how people could drive on 21s with less-than-perfect roads, I think it's just a matter of what people are looking for in terms of ride and what they're used to. I think I'd mentioned before but my wife's got a Golf R with 19s (rather low profile, I'd imagine similar to 21s on the Q5) and our roads certainly aren't perfect, but the car handles it very well. It's not silky smooth, but for a lot of people that lack of road feedback isn't desired. It has never been jarring, though, even on roads that have chunks missing or have been all scraped up (even potholes).
Obviously without having driven a Q5 with 21s I can't say for sure how it'd handle our roads, but based on our R it's at least not a foregone conclusion it'd be bad. That being said I think 19" is a good size for "normal" use, and probably wouldn't go larger than 20" personally. But we're all different.
#29
AudiWorld Expert
#30
Suspensions are slightly different between models, too. The TDi's engine is MUCH heavier than the others, so the front spring rates are different. Feels quite different to drive...