Q5/SQ5 MKI (8R) Discussion Discussion forum for the First Generation Audi Q5 SUV produced from 2008 to 2017

Suspension - SQ5 versus 3.0T

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2013, 09:16 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
koobah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spijun
Mistake
The difference between the of factory wheels 255/45R20 and 255/40R21 is only 1mm

1mm might be the difference between the overall wheel+tire height. The sidewall height on 21" is 1/2" lower vs 20", which is close to 13mm. So yeah, the 21" wheels are lower profile. Plus your offsets are whack. I believe they are 33 on the SQ5.
Old 09-13-2013, 11:57 AM
  #12  
AudiWorld Super User
 
spijun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarajevo /BiH
Posts: 3,886
Received 353 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by koobah
1mm might be the difference between the overall wheel+tire height. The sidewall height on 21" is 1/2" lower vs 20", which is close to 13mm. So yeah, the 21" wheels are lower profile. Plus your offsets are whack. I believe they are 33 on the SQ5.
On quattro drive and vehicle of 1800 kg think it is difficult to almost impossible to notice the difference of 13mm on the steering wheel
True I made a mistake for offsets, but it has nothing to do with the height 1mm
ET33 should instead of ET39 but this is not important in this case

You can put ET-65 or ET80 height remains the same

So normal to have a lower profile and it written on the tire 255/40 vs 255/45, but you are forget that 1" more

This is important
Name:  ScreenShot145_zps0418ebfc.jpg
Views: 225
Size:  148.0 KB

Conclusion: a set of tires 255/40R21 for 1mm lower than sets of tires 255/45R20

Good luck

Last edited by spijun; 09-13-2013 at 01:06 PM.
Old 09-13-2013, 08:48 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Super User
 
MP4.2+6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 15,136
Received 580 Likes on 486 Posts
Default I do not think this has been confirmed on the U.S. side

Spijun posted about it on the Euro side. On the U.S. side I don't recall any confirming posts, and U.S. EKTA isn't available outside the dealer network for 2014's as far as I know. Being specific, I am referring to either spring rates or damper firmness, which can either relate to or be independent of ride height. (Damper total travel and right height should relate to draw that out--in other words, shorter springs would typically mean shorter struts/shocks.) I do think the ride height issue has now gotten the proverbial fork stuck in it, including other current threads where the answers keep coming back the ride height for U.S. SQ's in the same as the other Q's, including now by a few posts (finally) with tape measures confirming it on the dealer lot. There are some online sites where you can see EKTA parts listings, but it only runs through 2013 AFAIK, and they aren't U.S. centric.

Thus, so far, I'm not sure that sport tuned in the U.S. means any more than optional 21's and some more PSI in the tire settings, or as mentioned previously, frankly that the U.S. marketing/copy writing people are just duplicating Euro PR copy and don't know what the U.S. specs actually ended up being. And we also know from lots of posts there have been more than a few mistakes in the Audi web site and in the PIB, so neither seem definitive source reliable either. I think it really takes part number scrutiny on U.S. specific models.

Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; 09-13-2013 at 09:05 PM.
Old 09-14-2013, 06:46 AM
  #14  
AudiWorld Member
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by spijun
Mistake
The difference between the of factory wheels 255/45R20 and 255/40R21 is only 1mm

I was referring to vs the 3.0T which has 19s and a higher sidewall.
Old 09-14-2013, 06:48 AM
  #15  
AudiWorld Member
 
dougnash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It seems like the only real meaningful difference between the SQ5 and the 3.0T with S-Line, is the higher-tuned engine. Is that about right? I know the SQ5 has slightly different interior trim, and slightly different rear bits. But by and large, that's it.
Old 09-14-2013, 07:34 AM
  #16  
AudiWorld Super User
 
spijun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarajevo /BiH
Posts: 3,886
Received 353 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dougnash
It seems like the only real meaningful difference between the SQ5 and the 3.0T with S-Line, is the higher-tuned engine. Is that about right? I know the SQ5 has slightly different interior trim, and slightly different rear bits. But by and large, that's it.
True, the same engine only difference in injection and ECU software
Old 09-14-2013, 07:47 AM
  #17  
AudiWorld Super User
 
spijun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarajevo /BiH
Posts: 3,886
Received 353 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acadianbob
I was referring to vs the 3.0T which has 19s and a higher sidewall.
Ok, but the next time to write exactly which model you think, (in Canada is 20 "on the S-line standard )
Old 09-14-2013, 08:24 AM
  #18  
AudiWorld Super User
 
MP4.2+6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 15,136
Received 580 Likes on 486 Posts
Default That, and a few other items

Front brakes are 380 mm. Seem to be out of the current D4 A8 parts bin from the 3.0T motor version:
  • semifloating rotors similar those also found on old C5 RS6, current RS5 and early R8 (those in 365mm and with a much different many piston Brembo caliper). Pin based design with a lighter hat make them somewhat lighter for the given diameter compared to a regular single cast iron rotor, albeit probably still heavier than the 345's on the 3.0T, TDI and Hybrid
  • some conflicting info so far, but calipers look like pretty standard issue volume Audi (A6, A8, etc.) with a paint job. Larger mass than the 345mm ones.
Quad exhaust a la pretty standard Audi S model (not S line): But no posts on whether this is just trim and sound or there is an actual pipe diameter and real flow change underneath compared to a std. 3.0T.; parts listings of the earlier sections would show this.

Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; 09-14-2013 at 08:27 AM.
Old 09-14-2013, 10:05 AM
  #19  
AudiWorld Super User
 
spijun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarajevo /BiH
Posts: 3,886
Received 353 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MP4.2+6.0
Front brakes are 380 mm. Seem to be out of the current D4 A8 parts bin from the 3.0T motor version:
  • semifloating rotors similar those also found on old C5 RS6, current RS5 and early R8 (those in 365mm and with a much different many piston Brembo caliper). Pin based design with a lighter hat make them somewhat lighter for the given diameter compared to a regular single cast iron rotor, albeit probably still heavier than the 345's on the 3.0T, TDI and Hybrid
  • some conflicting info so far, but calipers look like pretty standard issue volume Audi (A6, A8, etc.) with a paint job. Larger mass than the 345mm ones.
Quad exhaust a la pretty standard Audi S model (not S line): But no posts on whether this is just trim and sound or there is an actual pipe diameter and real flow change underneath compared to a std. 3.0T.; parts listings of the earlier sections would show this.
Believe it or not in the A6, A6 Avant, A7 Sportback implanted the same discs and components as well as the A4, A5, Q5: 320x30mm, 345x30mm company TRW-Girling

Name:  Clipboard_zpse76f2cc9.jpg
Views: 181
Size:  294.4 KB
Old 09-14-2013, 01:59 PM
  #20  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
koobah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MP4.2+6.0
Front brakes are 380 mm. Seem to be out of the current D4 A8 parts bin from the 3.0T motor version:
  • semifloating rotors similar those also found on old C5 RS6, current RS5 and early R8 (those in 365mm and with a much different many piston Brembo caliper). Pin based design with a lighter hat make them somewhat lighter for the given diameter compared to a regular single cast iron rotor, albeit probably still heavier than the 345's on the 3.0T, TDI and Hybrid
  • some conflicting info so far, but calipers look like pretty standard issue volume Audi (A6, A8, etc.) with a paint job. Larger mass than the 345mm ones.
Quad exhaust a la pretty standard Audi S model (not S line): But no posts on whether this is just trim and sound or there is an actual pipe diameter and real flow change underneath compared to a std. 3.0T.; parts listings of the earlier sections would show this.
Didn't know about the brake specs, but the devil is in the details. Exhaust, rear valance, mirrors, grille, inst panel gauges, carbon fiber trim, pretty much your standard A vs S fare.


Quick Reply: Suspension - SQ5 versus 3.0T



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:02 AM.