How much mileage are you guys getting on the Q7?
#21
AudiWorld Member
Manually derived MPG is not as accurate as the computer. There are too many variables outside of your control to allow for a accurate manual calculation.
The computer uses ambient temp, engine temp, throttle use and a bunch of other data points to calculate the MPG. How do I know this? I was able to get this from an insider.
The computer uses ambient temp, engine temp, throttle use and a bunch of other data points to calculate the MPG. How do I know this? I was able to get this from an insider.
But in reality, the manual method is exact miles you get per gallon. If you drive 500 miles from a full tank and you add 20 gallon to fill the tank again, you've got 25mpg. Isn't it?
#22
AudiWorld Member
Manually derived MPG is not as accurate as the computer. There are too many variables outside of your control to allow for a accurate manual calculation.
The computer uses ambient temp, engine temp, throttle use and a bunch of other data points to calculate the MPG. How do I know this? I was able to get this from an insider.
The computer uses ambient temp, engine temp, throttle use and a bunch of other data points to calculate the MPG. How do I know this? I was able to get this from an insider.
#23
AudiWorld Super User
It certainly is. It doesn't get any more accurate than miles driven/gal used. The computer is always overly optimistic which means that it was programmed to be this way.
#24
AudiWorld Senior Member
I think the jury is still out on this. Google "computer driven mpg accuracy" and you see a multitude of articles related to the pros/cons of car computers vs manual calculations. Some say the manufacturer loads the deck in favor of high mpg statistics to sell their cars; others swear by the manual calculations. Personally, I'm in the latter group. Really, it's no big deal and is just a curiosity thing for me.
#25
AudiWorld Member
Hell, I don't know; Google it and read several of the articles. If you believe the computer as gospel, then you can stick with the computer.
#26
I believe when it comes to derived and computer calculations, they will always show derived being lower.
When you derive the MPG, you are also calculating the fuel that has evaporated from the tank. Something that I highly doubt any manufacture would do because it isn't being burned by the engine. Also, depending on fuel temperature at time of delivery has a small impact on derived calculation. Topping off versus just stopping when the handle releases. Another small effect in MPG calculation.
Both or our current cars have Avg. MPG computers and both have wide variances compared to manual calculations anywhere from 2 to 0.2 mpg lower.
When you derive the MPG, you are also calculating the fuel that has evaporated from the tank. Something that I highly doubt any manufacture would do because it isn't being burned by the engine. Also, depending on fuel temperature at time of delivery has a small impact on derived calculation. Topping off versus just stopping when the handle releases. Another small effect in MPG calculation.
Both or our current cars have Avg. MPG computers and both have wide variances compared to manual calculations anywhere from 2 to 0.2 mpg lower.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
What are you guys getting for miles per tank. My DIS says 305. i hate looking at MPG hearts my......
1 sick s4
S4 (B6 & B7 Platforms) Discussion
15
04-02-2007 07:44 AM
A4AdMan
S4 (B6 & B7 Platforms) Discussion
28
09-09-2005 05:35 PM
A4wheelin
A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion
25
12-02-2004 12:38 PM