Which heads, etc., with the aluminium 3.0L block? 2.4L, 2.8L, 2.7L or RS4 ???
10-15-2006, 04:25 PM
#122
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where'd you see that?
I haven't seen any conclusive evidence that the cams do much of anything over the stockers. You should see an airflow difference or something: Paul's MAF logs look identical before and after the cams. SPturks car makes the same power as DAP's and Kevins even though he's running dumps and they're running a cat-back :/
10-15-2006, 04:30 PM
#124
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
YOUR RS6 TURBOS!!! call Tony @EPL he has spent more dyno time with those cams then Revolver!!....
i could gaurantee it,cause how could a company sell friggin cams if they knew it caused misfires?only way they didnt know is if they didnt test them or they knew it had misfires but sold them anyway and decided never to respond to emails or tell anyone,cause everyone i talked to with those cams have MISFIRES ,does rs4 cams cause misfires?
10-15-2006, 04:33 PM
#125
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many run RS4 cams without any negative effects. There is a local homebrew car running them....
car pulls consistent sub 3.5 second FATS on pump gas in summer on OEM K04s + RS4 cams, saw high 2 second FATS times in the winter.
10-15-2006, 04:36 PM
#128
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not smart enough to give a real opinion on the matter, but the lack of RS4 cams jumped out at me
when reading your post that started this thread.
If I did it over again, I'd add RS4 cams while the engine was out.
If I did it over again, I'd add RS4 cams while the engine was out.