S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi S4 & RS4 produced from 1998-2002

two turbos into one TB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2010, 04:33 PM
  #11  
AudiWorld Member
 
shawnoc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Three issues drive the decision between twin turbos vs. single:

1. packaging
2. performance (low end power is typically OEM preferred for driveability)
3. cost (single turbos are generaly cheaper)

There are some older single turbo cars out there (Pontiac TransAm, Buick Grand National...etc), but as you shrink the engine compartment and lower the hood packageing becomes even more difficult.
Old 02-03-2010, 05:06 PM
  #12  
AudiWorld Super User
 
complacentsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

But with FSI it completly changes the ball game.
Old 02-04-2010, 03:50 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
shawnoc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you mean fuel directly injected into the cyinder (Audi's FSI)? or the new GM diesel that is coming out.

The next generation of V8/V6 diesel engine is supposed to have the exhaust ports in the intake valley (which will simplify a single turbo configuration and lower costs) and the intake ports on the side of the engine. Not sure if this is out yet or not.
Old 02-04-2010, 04:23 PM
  #14  
AudiWorld Super User
 
complacentsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yep. That is exactly what I was talking about. I believe I saw a BWM (I think it was a V6 diesel BMW with a single turbo in the genter valley) that had the "inverted" configuration. I'm not sure why it wasn't thought of long ago. (on the deseil side) Once you take fuel injectors out of the equation you don't need to have the intake/fuel inectors pointed down.


With the huge push for fuel economy. I think this may be the future of turbo vehicles.
Old 02-04-2010, 04:53 PM
  #15  
AudiWorld Member
 
shawnoc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

GM looked at a while ago; however it was deemed too cost prohibitive due to underhood temperatures (the upper area of the engine compartment is pretty stagnant).

Newer materials, back then, are now commercialized so they're thinking it can be achieved. We'll see how it fairs when it debuts. My understanding is that its going to replace the Isuzu Duramax engine that's in the current GM trucks.

I agree though that in time, we'll see this happen with gas engines as well. Just imagine how easy it would be to change the turbos in the S4 if it were in the valley.

Of course the other path is Eaton's supercharger in the valley which is heavier but more modular.
Old 02-04-2010, 05:23 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Super User
 
complacentsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah. Looking at the MB with the integrated supercharger, water to air inntercooler, and intake manifold are a really sweet design.
Old 02-04-2010, 07:14 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Member
 
shawnoc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, the compressor efficiency is pretty close to an equivalent turbo (except on the top end). Just a lot of weight really high up in the engine compartment.

Just what an Audi needs huh, more weight up higher over the front wheels
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lowndes
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
3
08-26-2003 09:40 AM
dentman
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
6
08-11-2003 05:24 PM
Haystack
Performance and Tuning
1
04-09-2003 05:16 PM
BorntoBill
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
3
12-12-2001 07:57 PM
bletour
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
4
02-13-2001 10:25 PM



Quick Reply: two turbos into one TB?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:34 AM.