A4 (B9 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B9 Audi A4 2017-

190 vs 252 hp on 2.oT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2017, 02:23 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Saltillo, Coah., MX
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 190 vs 252 hp on 2.oT

I'm new to Audi, after 7 happy (not trouble free) years with a 525i BMW.

The 2.0T comes with 190HP and 252HP, I have the former.

What is the difference between the engines for those +62HP ?
Hardware, software?
Old 12-06-2017, 02:29 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Member
 
Stevereddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Both
Old 12-06-2017, 05:43 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Glisse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,544
Received 490 Likes on 334 Posts
Default

Yes, the new 190HP engine has more advanced hardware. It is a B-Cycle engine (specifically an EA888 Type 3-B), as is the EA838 3.0TFSI used in the S4. This mean variable compression, variable valve timing, etc, etc. There have been many article on this engine published on the web. Just search "Audi B-cycle".

It is one of the most fuel efficient engines the group makes, which is normally the reason people buy it. Doesn't make sense to me that you would choose this engine, and then try to turn it in to something else. If you prefer power over efficiency, the "standard" 252hp version would have been a better choice. Perhaps you are in a market where choices are limited.
Old 12-06-2017, 07:25 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Saltillo, Coah., MX
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glisse
Yes, the new 190HP engine has more advanced hardware. It is a B-Cycle engine (specifically an EA888 Type 3-B), as is the EA838 3.0TFSI used in the S4. This mean variable compression, variable valve timing, etc, etc. There have been many article on this engine published on the web. Just search "Audi B-cycle".

It is one of the most fuel efficient engines the group makes, which is normally the reason people buy it. Doesn't make sense to me that you would choose this engine, and then try to turn it in to something else. If you prefer power over efficiency, the "standard" 252hp version would have been a better choice. Perhaps you are in a market where choices are limited.
Thanks for the info, I will read about that B-cycle engine. BTW I have no intention of modifying it.

In Mexico the two engines are available, 190 and 252HP, although the price for the more powerful engine climbs by more than 40%. The pull of the 190HP and 236 lb-ft is very nice actually.

I am more of an environmentalist and although I like the sensation of power, in the long run I prefer fuel efficiency. I was surprised on the first road trip, 500 km half at 160-170km/h and half 120 km/h it yielded a little over 34MPG
Old 12-06-2017, 08:13 AM
  #5  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
minmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 1,044
Received 102 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jieg
I was surprised on the first road trip, 500 km half at 160-170km/h and half 120 km/h it yielded a little over 34MPG
Holy Cow, you can drive at 160-170km/h (100 -106 miles/h). Now that's called fun with A4.
Old 12-06-2017, 10:03 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Saltillo, Coah., MX
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by minmet
Holy Cow, you can drive at 160-170km/h (100 -106 miles/h). Now that's called fun with A4.
I wanted to go faster, but my wife was riding with me! (although for minutes I peak at 180)

It was really fun, very quiet and comfortable ride, and I was amazed that at 170 km/h the engine runs at 2500 rpm, see the pic
Attached Thumbnails 190 vs 252 hp  on  2.oT-whatsapp-image-2017-12-06-12.59.03-pm.jpeg  
Old 12-07-2017, 03:21 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Member
 
cruiserchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I also went with the 190 HP engine, and it has plenty of power for me. My previous car (Acura TSX) had about the same HP, but much less torque. I have had the car for a year, and have averaged 39 mpg, doing mainly highway driving to/from work. I averaged about 30 mpg in my TSX.
Old 12-08-2017, 04:38 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
cuke2u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

+1 for the 190...
Old 12-11-2017, 08:19 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
luisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 22
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi guys, maybe you can try to drive in Dynamic mode, or in S , I think consumption and performance would be a little better...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samps
A4 (B9 Platform) Discussion
0
01-30-2016 09:17 PM
arkbbq
Q7 MK 1 Discussion
3
11-15-2010 11:29 PM
HZW
Inline-5 Discussion
0
05-15-2007 08:15 AM
frankie@work
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
26
08-06-2005 05:50 AM



Quick Reply: 190 vs 252 hp on 2.oT



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 AM.