A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C5 Audi A6 and S6 produced from 1998-2004

Autoweek on the new one.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2004, 08:01 AM
  #21  
V
New Member
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do
Old 02-18-2004, 08:05 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
John J Szobocsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default March '04 issue of Car alludes to a rear wheel drive version of the A4

Car magazine states that Audi engineers are developing a rear wheel drive version of the current generation A4 before an all new platform is released. The article states that Audi engineers were not pleased with the NVH characteristics of the Maserati platform that VW is rumored to be using for its intermediate car.

I do find it interesting that Audi has released relatively few details about the car. Audi released the base dimensions and the engine types but Audi is usually very generous with technological achievements made with a new design. I have yet to read much on the overall construction of the new A6 or the aerodynamic qualities. Even information about the chassis is limited. The Audi UK website hints to various technological achievements for the new A6 but beyond the headlight technical details are very limited. This website mentions an agile platform and that the A6 represents a "driver's car" yet the proof is not provided.

I guess more information will trickle out before and after the show in Genf.

Cordially,

John J. Szobocsan

NM TT #11
'05 S4 Cabriolet on order
Old 02-18-2004, 08:27 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
John J Szobocsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Yamaha HPDI is a two-stroke engine

An automobile engine is not the same as a two-stroke motor design. Emission and fuel consumption standards are different. Additionally, performance and reliability criteria are very different. The components for an automobile engine have much higher reliability standards and are thus much more sensitive to fuel quality issues.

I did a technology review of the Yamaha HPDI system versus the Ficht system and I found the Yamaha system very novel. By the way Ficht was originally designed to improve the performance of the East German built Trabant, a not-too-distant relation to today's Audis. If memory serves me correctly the Trabant was manufactured in the former DKW facility in Zwickau--the old Auto Union nee DKW nee Audi plant!

Cordially,

John J. Szobocsan

NM TT #11
'05 S4 Cabriolet on order
Old 02-18-2004, 08:48 AM
  #24  
DWP
AudiWorld Super User
 
DWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Way too polite IMHO. You were asking for a beatdown, you know!
Old 02-18-2004, 08:50 AM
  #25  
AudiWorld Super User
 
kjb99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 17,784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Thanks for the info, I was not thinking that the fact that

the Yamaha motor was a two-stroke would matter.
Old 02-18-2004, 09:10 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
phred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default This seems to be the new trend

Everyone has done a 180 and will now work and spend hard to convince John Q. Customer that in fact RWD is best and always has been best and forget what we used to sell you about FWD.

And in terms of handling bigtime HP and torque, RWD is the best way to go, but perhaps not the best setup for the non-enthusiast.
Old 02-18-2004, 09:17 AM
  #27  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
April's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 52,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default I think you are correct. Pure speculation on their part, without knowing the product range

or thoroughly reading the press release form VAG.
Old 02-18-2004, 09:21 AM
  #28  
Member
 
OPTIMUS PRlME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yeah i thought i had it coming.. =)
Old 02-18-2004, 09:23 AM
  #29  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
April's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 52,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well the 0-60 times seem reasonable. Does anybody look beyond that? ;-)
Old 02-18-2004, 09:43 AM
  #30  
Member
Thread Starter
 
spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Probably not. I guess it's right with the 530, but .05 slower than 2.7T, right?


Quick Reply: Autoweek on the new one.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 PM.