Did a Google search "XM vs. Sirius" and now Im REALLY confused!!
10-15-2004, 01:59 PM
#2
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO. . XM. . . . larger, more stable a company. . . and I was told
less problems. Perhaps the market has now changed. . look at the equity of both stocks.
P.S. today, it would be a no-brainer for me.. no interested in supporting garbage mouth.
P.S. today, it would be a no-brainer for me.. no interested in supporting garbage mouth.
10-15-2004, 02:22 PM
#3
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm with you Mr. Ricco. I think XM is the more stable platform at present
and Sirius' fortunes will be artifically propped up by the premium some users pay to hear Stern spout his useless vile talk. I'm annoyed XM is following suit with the Opie and Anthony, but it won't have as large an impact on their financials as Stern will for Sirius.
Trending Topics
10-15-2004, 04:31 PM
#8
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
XM vs. Sirius
One thing to consider when you make your decision is that Clear Channel Communications has invested in XM and weilds influence over them much like it does in all of its radio stations. You can do your own research about the effect that Clear Channel has had on the public airwaves (since it is really off topic) and draw your own conclusions.
10-15-2004, 04:41 PM
#9
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
This is a "serious" issue with me in that I do have other issues
with Clear Channel. I know of Clear Channels influence in that Ive already brought suit in federal court on behalf of a local client who has been "wronged" by them! I am being as gentle as possible with my words! I should have done more research into this subject and Im just thankful that this forum brings so much to the table.
