intake air temp. air box. vs knn cone filter open to engine bay. 2002 allroad
over the next few days/ weeks im going to be running some tests on my intake air temp. i have a vag com coming, that will hopefully be able to tell me my intake temp. im going to be testing the temp, and possibly hp, and w.e else i find usefull. in all the different scenarios. i havent seen any other write ups on this. does anybody have any suggestions or things that they would like me to test?
|
2 Attachment(s)
ok. so after multiple tests. i have some results to show.
stock airbox with ram air. vs cone filter after maf sensor. Attachment 31419 vs Attachment 31420 I tested 3 different scenarios. - idling for 25 mins - driving 19 miles at 75 mph - and 3-4 miles of stop and go traffic __________________________________________________ So after idling for 25 mins my results were - cone filter @ 34*F outside for 25 mins = IAT of 145*F - stock setup @ 38*F outside for 25 mins = IAT of 136*F --So that means that the stock setup ran 13* cooler During driving for 19 miles my results were - cone filter @ 36-38*F outside = IAT of 51-59*F - stock setup @ 36-39*F outside = IAT of 57-62*F --And that also means that the cone filter ran about 2* cooler And after 3-4 miles of stop and go driving - cone filter @ 34*F outside = IAT of 91*F - stock setup @ 42*F outside = IAT of 107*F -- And the stock setup ran about 8* cooler here Im honestly surprised that the stock setup wasn't significantly cooler than the cone filter which is completely open to the engine bay. |
Originally Posted by allroad'n
(Post 24436256)
ok. so after multiple tests. i have some results to show.
stock airbox with ram air. vs cone filter after maf sensor. Attachment 31419 vs Attachment 31420 I tested 3 different scenarios. - idling for 25 mins - driving 19 miles at 75 mph - and 3-4 miles of stop and go traffic __________________________________________________ So after idling for 25 mins my results were - cone filter @ 34*F outside for 25 mins = IAT of 145*F - stock setup @ 38*F outside for 25 mins = IAT of 136*F --So that means that the stock setup ran 13* cooler During driving for 19 miles my results were - cone filter @ 36-38*F outside = IAT of 51-59*F - stock setup @ 36-39*F outside = IAT of 57-62*F --And that also means that the cone filter ran about 2* cooler And after 3-4 miles of stop and go driving - cone filter @ 34*F outside = IAT of 91*F - stock setup @ 42*F outside = IAT of 107*F -- And the Cone Filter ran about 8* cooler here Im honestly surprised that the stock setup wasn't significantly cooler than the cone filter which is completely open to the engine bay. Also, try a cone filter with some sort of heat shield so that the heat from the engine bay doesn't attach itself to the filter and becomes more of a heat soak, than actual power/breathing room. |
jeez, i really need to fire my proofreaders. hah . yea, ive been looking into a setup similar to the one the ricam78 has. but i think i will stick with the stock setup until i go stage 3+.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands