Other (Non-Audi) Autos Discussion Discussion forum for non-Audi vehicles

Driven: 2013 Honda Accord Sedan

Old 09-26-2012, 10:23 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
TIME89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,101
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Driven: 2013 Honda Accord Sedan

By John Beltz Snyder September 24, 2012

The 2013 Honda Accord marks the 30th anniversary of the well-known nameplate. With an opportunity to commemorate this milestone with the best version of the car to date, well, we’ll go ahead and spoil it for you and say that Honda has succeeded. If you’re looking for a mid-sized family sedan that is high in quality, very comfortable, efficient, and (dare we say it?) actually fun to drive, this is the Accord you’ve been waiting for.



The Honda Accord sedan comes with a choice of two engines. First is an all-new 2.4-liter inline-four with direct injection, producing 185 horsepower and 181 pound-feet of torque (189/182 in the Sport trim). Certain models offer a six-speed manual transmission, but the one we tested was fitted with a continuously variable transmission. With the CVT, fuel economy is rated at 27 miles per gallon in the city, and 36 mpg on the highway, for a combined rating of 30 mpg—up by 3 mpg from the 2012 model.




The 3.5-liter V-6 is mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. This six-pot mill offers 278 horsepower and 252 pound-feet of torque. Fuel economy figures for this engine are 21 mpg city, and an impressive 34 mpg on the highway. This improved fuel economy is in no small part attributable to the V-6’s Variable Cylinder Management (VCM) system. VCM allows the engine to use all six of its cylinders when the driver asks for more power and acceleration from the right pedal. The 2013 model ditches the four-cylinder mode from last year’s model, and instead uses three-cylinder operation under a wider range of driving situations.

Driven: 2013 Honda Accord Sedan



We spent most of our time in the V-6 model—an EX-L with navigation. Getting inside it feels markedly upscale, perhaps half a class above competition such as the new Nissan Altima. It offers a mature look and feel, and the interior is laid out in an organized way. Our tester featured an attractive center stack topped with an eight-inch display. Below that was a smaller touchscreen display, then HVAC controls, with redundant infotainment controls along the bottom, for those who prefer not to bother with the touchscreen while driving. Our tester was also equipped with Bluetooth connectivity, satellite navigation, and Pandora internet radio to make us feel as though all our bases were covered in terms of technology.



As we headed out onto the Pacific Coast Highway, we found the ride to be very comfortable, quiet and smooth, with very little noise from the engine, wind, or road making its way inside the vehicle. The V-6 was exceptionally well suited to highway cruising, we found. It tracked nicely, without needing a lot of input from the driver. Visibility is ample, which allowed us to confidently navigate highway traffic.



In addition to large windows, a low beltline, and narrow A-pillars helping visibility, the new Accord offers a small piece of technology we found to be particularly remarkable. The Lane View feature is pretty simple: a small camera housed in the bottom of the passenger-side mirror that points downward and to the rear. You can choose to leave it on (which might be a bit dizzying for occupants who might be watching it), or set it to activate when you use the right turn signal. It displays whatever is beside and behind the right side of the vehicle on the large display on the center stack. On the highway, this allowed us to change lanes confidently, certain we weren’t encroaching on any driver that might be hanging in our blind spot. In the city, it allowed us to keep an eye on cyclists that might sneak up alongside us when making a right turn. Finally, of course, it was useful when parallel parking, allowing us to maintain a perfect distance from the curb every time. While it may feel like a bit of a novelty to some, we found it to be fantastically useful, and we hope to see this sort of thing catch on.



After driving for a while, we still felt comfortable in the soft yet supportive front seats. We never start to feel cramped, and were, in fact, quite impressed with the roominess of this cabin, as well as the well-thought-out ergonomics. Though we had plenty of space, none of the controls felt too far away. We had no trouble finding a nice seating position, with easy reach to the steering wheel and pedals, and we didn’t experience cramping or fatigue as we piled on the miles. When one factors in the roomy rear seats, the Accord sedan adds up to be a really nice touring car. This opinion was even more firmly cemented when we found the posted highway mileage in the V-6 to be easy to achieve.



And we weren’t bored to death, either. Not even close. The V-6-powered sedan is a decidedly quick car. It takes off eagerly from the line and accelerates aggressively to highway speeds. It is capable of easy passing maneuvers, and remains robustly powerful when you set the cruise control above posted speed limits. As we headed away from the highway onto long country roads that curved between hillside vineyards, it felt well planted in the corners. The steering offered up plenty of information about the road surface, but without adding too much vibration. The weight of the steering was nice and natural; it had a little bit of play on center, but weighted up progressively as we added more steering angle.



Driven: 2013 Honda Accord SedanOn these same back roads, we found the terrain to get much rougher than what we even usually find in Michigan after the snow melts in the spring. These were some bumpy roads, folks, patched and multicolored with uneven layers of tar spread across them. The Accord’s suspension dispatched this sad, mottled tarmac like a champion. In most other vehicles, we would have been clenching our teeth if just to keep all our fillings in place. The Accord did its best to even out this terrain, and while we were able to hear the tires reacting to the rough surfaces, the motion that made its way into the cabin was minimal.



The only disappointment was in that, in our tester, there was no way to shift through the gears on our own. The console-mounted shift lever was your basic PRND setup, with no manual mode. The only addition was an S mode at the bottom, which offered a little bit more aggressive shift schedule, holding onto the gears a bit longer than it would in D. That said, the transmission doesn’t take away from the smooth driving experience. It swaps gears quickly and quietly, making it difficult to notice when the change happens if you aren’t paying attention. Fair enough, say we; if you’re not going to let us get more involved in the driving experience, the next best thing is to keep out of the way.



So, after a long drive taking us through city, highway, and country roads, we were still feeling fresh and ready to drive some more. We managed to finagle our way into a four-cylinder EX-L CVT sedan (it helps to be the first to finish lunch on these events). Heading back out over some more of those choppy country roads, we found that the differences in NVH weren’t really that noticeable. What little difference there was came from the combination of motor and transmission, and the sound they produced together. The song was a bit less smooth and pleasing as the V-6, but really nothing to complain about. In fact, we found this CVT and engine to function better than what we were used to, especially in terms of shift logic. The CVT didn’t hold the revs too high, and seemed to sweep slowly up the ladder in a progressive, natural way. Even at the top, under full load, the motor didn’t have that overwhelmingly buzzy and droning effect we’ve experienced so many times before in CVT equipped cars. The technology seems to be becoming more occupant-friendly, and the Honda Accord represents another step toward CVTs mitigating the sonic and experiential drawbacks the come with greater fuel efficiency. Welcome to the future; it’s a quieter place.Driven: 2013 Honda Accord Sedan



Those who want to save some dough at the lot and at the pump may be wooed by the charms of the four-cylinder Accord. That car, with the CVT, starts at $22,480—a bit more than $10,000 less than the base V-6 model. From that point, the four-banger seems a greater value.



If you’re more concerned about the price of living with it, though, think twice, especially if most of your driving is done on the highway. We experienced almost the same highway mileage in both cars. This is probably because we had to be a bit more aggressive with the throttle with the I-4 to compensate for the lack of power, while the V-6 was effortlessly quick.



If it were our money, we’d be leaning more toward the added power and amenities included with the larger motor. It’s just that nice to use. Plus, if a navigation system is essential to you, the price between the two different powerplants shrinks to just over two-grand (29,995 for the 2.4 EX-L with navigation, vs. 32,070 for the same trim 3.5). At that point, it’s a no-brainer. We’ll take the extra 93 horsepower, thank you.



Either way, if you want a capable, roomy, high-quality sedan with hardly any faults to be found, you’ll be doing just fine with this new Accord.



2013 Honda Accord Sedan EX-L V-6

Engine: V-6, 3.5-liters, 24v

Output: 278 hp/252 lb-ft

0-60 MPH: 6.2 sec (est)

Fuel Economy, City/Hwy: 21/34 mpg

Base Price: $30,070

Last edited by TIME89; 09-26-2012 at 10:28 AM.
Old 09-26-2012, 10:44 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Member
 
wreck111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My wife had 5 Honda's and after all the brakes problems with wearing out in 15K on the rears (2008 and 2009's) and Honda saying, NORMAL never again. It told a class action to get Honda to pay up. Now she is on her forth Subaru 1999,2002 2004 2012 and will never look back. She does 35,000 plus a year all highway and needs something that is comfortable and reliable. Subaru and great to deal with and cares about there customers. Plus there seats are great. 2012 Outback 4cyl CVT 32-34 MPG always...
SCREW HONDA!
Old 09-26-2012, 11:40 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
TIME89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,101
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wreck111
My wife had 5 Honda's and after all the brakes problems with wearing out in 15K on the rears (2008 and 2009's) and Honda saying, NORMAL never again. It told a class action to get Honda to pay up. Now she is on her forth Subaru 1999,2002 2004 2012 and will never look back. She does 35,000 plus a year all highway and needs something that is comfortable and reliable. Subaru and great to deal with and cares about there customers. Plus there seats are great. 2012 Outback 4cyl CVT 32-34 MPG always...
SCREW HONDA!
We have Accord in our family, that I buy new in 1998. It's over 150K mls right now and with few minor and major issue it's driven every day and not look as bad as many newer cars on the road.

Purpose of this post was introduction to latest Honda Accord model, not SCREW HONDA because.....
There a are plenty issues with any new cars German, Japanese, American, Korean. And this is not a place to bashing cars. You can go to any Honda forum and state your opinion there.
Old 09-26-2012, 11:56 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Member
 
wreck111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's not bashing it' the truth, this is what forums are for. Positive and negative. I have had several Honda's all great cars until the 2008's and 09's came out. This is when Honda ran the other way. Every make has it's own problems even Audi. The question is do they run away or stand up and say " yes we have a problem and will stand behind it"
Honda did not! If they would have things would be different. Look at the resale on the later Accords, weak at best.

Question, why was your post on an Audi forum. Sorry but it works both ways. We all love our Audi's and this is why we post, even though some of us have had problems with the make. As long as Audi stands behind the problems that some of us might have we will remain loyal.




http://www.girardgibbs.com/case/44/honda-brakes/
Old 09-26-2012, 12:46 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
TIME89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,101
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wreck111
It's not bashing it' the truth, this is what forums are for. Positive and negative. I have had several Honda's all great cars until the 2008's and 09's came out. This is when Honda ran the other way. Every make has it's own problems even Audi. The question is do they run away or stand up and say " yes we have a problem and will stand behind it"
Honda did not! If they would have things would be different. Look at the resale on the later Accords, weak at best.

Question, why was your post on an Audi forum. Sorry but it works both ways. We all love our Audi's and this is why we post, even though some of us have had problems with the make. As long as Audi stands behind the problems that some of us might have we will remain loyal.




http://www.girardgibbs.com/case/44/honda-brakes/
Like BMW do with HPFP issue with N54 engines, like Audi do with buildup and 4 yr old navigation map in 2012 cars, like Toyota do with Prius and many other manufactures.
Answer to your question - because name of this forum - Other (Non-Audi) Autos Discussion.
This guy drive the car, not me, and post his opinion. I posted his opinion in quite, because it was not my post. His post about new Honda Accord, not 2008 or 2009 - 2013.
You comments was out of place and I explain you why.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yatesd
A4 (B8 Platform) Discussion
14
07-21-2008 04:53 PM
antiSUV
S4 (B6 & B7 Platforms) Discussion
15
05-03-2008 01:00 PM
the italian
Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3
22
10-14-2006 03:42 PM
EGRoadster
TT (Mk1) Discussion
9
10-08-2005 06:08 AM
mpwolf
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
27
09-02-2003 02:51 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Driven: 2013 Honda Accord Sedan



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 PM.