Performance and Tuning Discussion forum for various performance tuning techniques and questions

suspensions: coilovers vs spring shock combos

Old 02-21-2002, 10:22 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
allegro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default suspensions: coilovers vs spring shock combos

i have a silver S4 6 speed and was wondering if you guys could help me out. i'm planning on buying some aftermarket suspension in a couple of weeks but was a little undecided on which one i should get. please help me out!

1. are coilovers that much better than standard spring/shock combos? if so, in what way?
2. are coilovers harsher in ride quality than spring/shock combos? i understand that the damping or whatever on coilovers are specially valved to take in that extra harshness... if they do, does that mean coilovers and spirg/shocks are similar in ride quality?
3. what aftermarket suspension setups (for both coilover and spring/shock combo) have the smoothest ride quality?
4. which ones are the cheapest?

thanks in advance!!! =)
Old 02-21-2002, 01:28 PM
  #2  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
PeteH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Consider a few things.....

1) do you plan to use the car for driving events, lapping sessions or autocross events?
If so, then you should consider height and rebound adjutable coilovers. I attend at least 6 DEs a year and wish I had done coilovers.

If not, then go with fixed-height shocks and springs. There are many good combinations out there.


2) Is cost a factor?
If so, then fixed height shocks/springs are your answer.

If not, coilovers may cost $200-$1000 more than spring/shocks combo, so get ready to lighten the wallet.

3) do you NEED to adjust the height from low in the summer to high in the winter due to road condition???
If so, then coilovers are a solution.

Coilovers are not necessarily better than shocks/springs, but they do offer height adjustment and some allow you to soften or tighten the shock rebound and compression rates. Also, the damper in a coilover is tuned more for the spring used on the coilover, so the argument there is that the set is more matched than any spring/shock combo.

I have ridden in an S4 with the H&R coilovers and the ride was no different than my A4 with Eibach ProKit and Bilstein shocks. However, the ride is harsher than the stock S4 suspension (better IMHO).

As for price, H&R about $1200, KW about $1500, Statis Engineering $2500... take some time, shop around, I think I saw someone trying to put together a group buy on H&R....

Hope that helps,

PeteH
Old 02-21-2002, 01:28 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
snoogins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Something to read (long)...

Fully-Adjustable Coilover Suspension for the street? You sure you wanna do that?



Are you committed to buying an adjustable coil-over suspension for the car? Contrary to Audiworld opinion, an adjustable coil-over suspension on a street car is a poor idea and can hurt the handling of the car. Allow me to explain.

The whole purpose of a fully-adjustable coil-over suspension (FACOS - not an industry term) is, as expected, adjustability (do you know that you already have coilover suspension, stock?) However, with that adjustability is a LOT of setup requirements. If you don't setup the suspension properly, you are almost guaranteed to make your car handle worse than stock. It might ride stiffer, and look lower, but it won't handle better. See, the FACOS give you not only the ability to adjust ride height, but corner weights as well. If the corner weight is not set correctly then you end up with cross-weight all out of whack and the car's handling becomes unpredictable.

Think of corner weights this way: you take a four-legged stool with all legs the same length. When you sit on that chair, all four legs are touching the ground evenly, pushing down onto the ground evenly, if you will, and the chair doesn't rock. If you were to place scales under each leg you would find that with your weight perfectly balanced in the center of the chair all four scales would read equally. Lean one way or another and you'll find that the weight will be shifting from scale to scale but the chair will continue to be steady and not rock. The reason is because of one unique thing: the sum of the opposing corners will always equal each other. In other words, the LF plus the RR weight will always equal the RF plus the LR weight.

But, suppose you slightly trim one chair leg, say 1/16". Now, the chair is going to rock slightly, because more of the weight is being held by the opposing corner legs. In fact, if you're good at balancing, then 100% of the weight will only be on two legs, while the other two legs aren't even touching the ground. The LF+RR weight will be LESS than the RF+LR weight.

This is the idea behind corner weights on a car. FACOS is adjustable not just for ride height (different length springs will do the same thing); the goal is to adjust each spring independently so that the cross weights are identical. You'll still have more weight in the sum of the fronts versus the sum of the rears (and you can adjust that to a degree with spring rates), but when the sum of the cross weights are equal the car will handle the same left to right and will be MUCH more predictable.

If, for instance, you have too much weight LF/RR than RF/LR, the car will turn in nice and sharp to the right, but will understeer in transit through the corner, and probably during exit. To the left the car will lean over more, transfer a lot of weight during the turn in, and then probably oversteer through the corner. It won't be fun to drive either way, and you'll be scratching your head trying to figure out why it's an evil-handling car.

To set up a car properly with a FACOS, you:

- install your suspension and set the spring perches about where you figure you'll need them for ride height, and equal all around.

- put the car on the ground and test ride height. Ride height is set to either race prep rules (minimum ride height) or to the lowest you can for the conditions. Those "conditions" are either external limitations (don't want the exhaust or spoiler to drag the ground) or internal (wheel clearance or bump stops.) That ride height also has to be adjusted based by testing to determine that you have enough suspension travel and the suspension doesn't bottom out; if you bottom out the suspension you're making your "spring rate" go infinite and you've just wasted all your money on an adjustable suspension. Also, don't forget the ride height is adjustable front and rear, left and right.

- After the ride height is set then the car needs to be aligned to spec. That "spec" is either to the factory limits (which you will likely never be able to obtain with a lowered car) or to values based on track testing, tire pyrometer temperatures, tire pressure results, and driver feedback.

- Once the ride height and alignment is set, then the car needs to be placed on four independent scales. These scales will give you the corner weights that you need to know to set the suspension properly. The nifty versions of the scales are digital and radio-transmitted, and give you a display box you can take with you around the car while the car is on a lift on the scales and you adjust the suspension with another display that does the math for you (about $2000 minimum for ones like that). What you want to do is adjust each spring perch independently so that the sums of the cross-weights match. If a corner is low, you extend the spring perch (chair leg) to put more weight on that corner. Of course, that will then affect all 3 other corners, so you have to go around and around until you get the numbers you want.

Of course, this is all assuming that you're running the springs you want, because a change in the spring rate will cause height to change and all those adjustments to go out the window...

- once you've made all the corner weights perfect, you have to go back and check the ride height, because it's quite possible that all the corner weight adjustment has changed the ride height. If so, start all over again. Don't settle on "good enough"; the whole point of getting FACOS is to get it RIGHT, right?

Then, once it's all set, it's time to go to the race track. Start on the skidpad and check handling. Slight changes in alignment and ride height will help you here (with associated updates to corner weights), but if you need to change front-to-rear bias for better handling you have to change springs (but, of course, one of the big advantages to FACOS is that it uses standard springs - you get to pick-and-choose your spring rates for each end.) Change the springs, start from the top, Maestro! You can also tune the corner-weights for a particular race track, like Lime Rock which is all right turns save one; of course that will make it suck on the street where you're going to be hard-pressed to find only right-hand turns...

You asked if the springs can be installed for $200? Dude, you can't even properly align and setup the car with the springs INSTALLED for $200!!!

Whew! Have I gotten my point across?

I have a FACOS on my little Nissan race car, but I have a $1200 set of scales. We'll spend an entire day on initial suspension setup, and constantly twiddle with it at the track.

I would NEVER install FACOS on my street car. The ironic part is that any "tuner" worth his salt has gone through all the above with an adjustable suspension, tested it to perfection of spring rates, travel, and ride height and alignment, and then took those specs and developed a comparable off-the-shelf replacement spring to give you something probably DAMN close to what you're gonna end up with on a FACOS. It just makes no sense to have all that adjustability, ESPECIALLY considering that when you finally get it set up you'll likely NEVER change it! Because if you do, you've got to start all over from the top. Kinda silly to have that adjustability when it ain't ever gonna be adjusted...

Installing a fully-adjustable coil-over suspension on a car without properly setting it up is either posin' or pissin' in the wind. It may look nice in your sigline, but you're actually hurting the car's handling.

As an alternative, consider the costs of finding a top-notch set of adjustable shocks and aftermarket springs, and paying someone to swap out the springs twice a year like you would for snow tires. You'll pay a bit annually in labor, but you'll be using a proven solution that anyone with an alignment rack can deal with.

Unfortunately, since I'm not very knowledgeable about the TT specifically, I'll have to defer specific suspension suggestions to others. What I suggest is to drive other same-type cars that have the various combinations you're interested in. It's *you* that has to live with those combos, not me and not the guy that claims his suspension is the best, and your tastes will vary from mine and his. There's nothing better than actually riding in or driving a car that has a spring/shock candidate. Don't take others' words for it, try it yourself and decide what your compromise is.

And it will be a compromise. "The Ultimate" for the track will be unacceptable for going to work, while a sportier suspension will give you a better handling car without leaving most of your undercoating on the parking lot speed bump or requiring monthly dental visits.

I just thought of something else you really should do with FACOS: have adjustable-end swaybars. In racing, swaybars are a tuning device, not a suspension device; you size the suspension springs to give you the weight balance and anti-roll that you want, THEN you apply swaybars to tune the balance of the car.

If the bars are attached during the suspension setup phase, then a bar may have a load (or "torsion") applied to it, screwing up your actual cross-weights (one end of the bar will lift a wheel, while the other end is pushing down). AFTER the car is set up you install swaybars with adjustable Heim-joint end to install it with no preload at all. If you don't have adjustable end bars, you'll have to force one end into place, preloading it, and screwing up all the work you just did.

For the street, bars are a nice compromise. Since street cars need to have a somewhat-compliant ride, swaybars are a way to make the car "feel" like it has stiffer springs on the outside corner of a turn. When a car rolls, the inside wheel drops relative to the car, pulling down on the bar which pulls down on the outside tire, forcing it into the pavement. It "thinks" it has a stiffer spring. Of course, if you lift the inside wheel off the ground then you've reached the limit of the bar's capability and it doesn't work any harder.

Lots of things to think about. I'd like to think the off-the-shelf "tuners" have put that much thought into their products
Old 02-21-2002, 02:35 PM
  #4  
New Member
 
AntiHeroMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Good Answer! This is the difference between the drivers and the wannabes.

I have been watching the list for several months and this is the first time that I have seen an answer this good for this question. I would doubt seriously that very many people with coilovers have set them up correctly.
Old 02-21-2002, 08:38 PM
  #5  
New Member
 
mys4avant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I am confused......

"As an alternative, consider the costs of finding a top-notch set of adjustable shocks and aftermarket springs, and paying someone to swap out the springs twice a year like you would for snow tires. You'll pay a bit annually in labor, but you'll be using a proven solution that anyone with an alignment rack can deal with."


so you suggest people getting spring/adjustable shocks? I don't think with this combo after install will be corner balance correctly either!
Old 02-21-2002, 09:27 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
allegro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default uh.. whoaa.. i just want to get rid of the gap and have no body roll =)

i think i'll go spring/shocks thanks!
Old 02-22-2002, 04:38 AM
  #7  
Member
 
smallTTs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Good explanation. One comment...

You said, "if you need to change front-to-rear bias for better handling you have to change springs".

Unfortunately you don't change total front or total rear weight on the tires by changing springs. Perhaps you meant someting else?

Springs aren't going to change amount of weight transfer due to acceleration, braking or turning, either (except indirectly if you lower the center of gravity by lowering the car).
Old 02-22-2002, 05:42 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
PeteH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I think what snoogins70 means is.... (please correct me if I am wrong)

You have the stock springs for winter, when you need a little more ground clearnace over snow (never have THAT problem in Houston!!).

Then, in summer, replace them with aftermarket lower springs.

Also, adjustable shocks as in adjustable dampening, like on the Konis. This allows you to firm-up the rebound and compression but has no affect on ride height.

Fixed height spring/shock combos do not need the infinite amount of adjustment and corner balancing like a coilover. About the only thing you would need is an alignment.

Anyway.... I am totally guessing here,so I hope snoogins70 chimes in!!!!


PeteH
Old 02-22-2002, 09:07 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
snoogins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Correct....

...The best thing to do is to have adjustable shocks, and 2 sets of springs. One for summer, or track events, and one for winter. That way, when you change the srings, all that needs to be done is an allignment. When you change the height of a C-O-S, you need to corner weight the car again. That can time consuming. You shouldn't need a realignment, but getting the springs just right is tricky. I see no need for the coil overs myself, the're just too rough on our imperfect roads.
Old 02-22-2002, 12:32 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
snoogins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default BTW...I can't take credit for this. This was authored by the same guy that did the article in...

...the Quattro Quarterly last quarter.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: suspensions: coilovers vs spring shock combos



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 PM.