Performance and Tuning Discussion forum for various performance tuning techniques and questions

Water injection vs FMIC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2004, 04:59 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
poppachulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Water injection vs FMIC

I am considering purchasing a FMIC for my 01 a4. I was going to go with the racetc zflow if they rerelease it, but I have been reading many favorable things regarding WI. I live in Las VEgas and typically see 100+ degree weather in the summers. Would water injection be more favorable for this type of weather? During the winter, temps. are commonly in the 40's so there is little need for better cooling.
Should I go with WI and stock SMIC or a dedicated FMIC and no WI...Discuss.
Old 10-04-2004, 05:13 PM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Ray Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 20,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

both
Old 10-04-2004, 06:07 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
AntiSocial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2nd
Old 10-04-2004, 07:26 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Imolavirus@BuehnEngineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default both, but if only one...........

i'd go with the FMIC first. IMO, WI is just like a bandaid for poor air quality due to high heat. I'd rather start by fixing the problem with a better intercooler.
Old 10-05-2004, 02:51 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Mat Indukts Lambos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good short answer. I agree.
Old 10-05-2004, 06:38 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Angry Alex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 23,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3rd.
Old 10-05-2004, 02:30 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Member
 
auditunerb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default What I like about WI

is if you use a high octane/water mix it's like using race gas with the advantage it only comes on at your spec boost.
Old 10-05-2004, 03:30 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Imolavirus@BuehnEngineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default agreed, WI is not a bad thing....

but where as you're only getting an increase when you hit spec boost, the FMIC is going to be more efficient at cooling air 99% of the time
Old 10-05-2004, 03:58 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Phil type 951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fmic then wi later
Old 10-05-2004, 06:32 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Afrosquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Both preferably but....

If you want a "install and done" solution, get the fmic. If you're willing to tweak timing/AF via lemmiwinks, WI has better potential for power because of detonation suppression.

I'm running an aquamist 1S kit with the stock smic. Currently running Wild 100 software -1.5 degrees of timing. I'm getting close to zero correction on pump gas.


Quick Reply: Water injection vs FMIC



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:37 AM.