Who's got a fully tuned 2.0T ?
#1
Who's got a fully tuned 2.0T ?
Anyone on this forum has a fully tuned 2.0T (whether the block is from ESS or custom) - I know a couple of members are close to be done with theirs.
What are the hp/lb-ft obtained at what PSI and gas ?
The only info I have is 417hp from Momentum in their Golf !
Thanks
What are the hp/lb-ft obtained at what PSI and gas ?
The only info I have is 417hp from Momentum in their Golf !
Thanks
#2
I have a 2.0 but it only has a K04 on it
not even fully tuned since I am running a standard GIAC K04 chip for it and made around 240 hp on 91 octane and 18psi.
I am working on putting a big turbo on soon, when that is done I will post some hp #'s again.
I am working on putting a big turbo on soon, when that is done I will post some hp #'s again.
#3
It's not fully tuned, but if you trust any of those 1/4 mile HP calculators....
Using 3450 lbs as the weight (car was full street trim, nothing removed, plus me)
The 13.943 time is 252 hp
The 104.27mph is 305 hp
I slipped the clutch on the launch badly (2.1 60ft) Like I said, full street trim, with 94 octane gas, 15 psi boost, and severely lean through the traps (7000 RPM, 3rd gear). Temps were in the 40's.
FWIW, I don't trust most of these calculators, I tried a bunch of web-based ones, and these are the lowest numbers I could come up with, some were estimating 50hp more.
Anyways, I'll be limited by the injectors (440cc/m) to probably no more than 350hp when fully tuned, which I'm guessing is around 18-19psi or so. Larger injectors will happen later on, first things first though.
The 13.943 time is 252 hp
The 104.27mph is 305 hp
I slipped the clutch on the launch badly (2.1 60ft) Like I said, full street trim, with 94 octane gas, 15 psi boost, and severely lean through the traps (7000 RPM, 3rd gear). Temps were in the 40's.
FWIW, I don't trust most of these calculators, I tried a bunch of web-based ones, and these are the lowest numbers I could come up with, some were estimating 50hp more.
Anyways, I'll be limited by the injectors (440cc/m) to probably no more than 350hp when fully tuned, which I'm guessing is around 18-19psi or so. Larger injectors will happen later on, first things first though.
#4
John, when you use the calcs out there you do know they are for fwd/rwd
giving crank hp. You will have to add another 10% to get your correct crank hp for AWD. What I dont like about most calcs I find is that they dont include the 60 ft time which is very important to getting hp for the ET.
#6
Well, I doubt I'm making 300+ hp......
As much as I would like to say I am, I just can't make myself believe that my car in a hacked-up state of tune is making that much power.
It's possible it is, but I can't prove it.
It's possible it is, but I can't prove it.
#7
Which part are you talking about?
60 ft times will change your ET which will also change your hp reading on a hp calc.
A car runs 13 flat with a 2.1 60 ft on run 1 and 12.8 with a 1.8 60 ft. Now a calc this will show differnt hp if it does not include a 60 ft with it.
Now if it was about the awd vs fwd/rwd, the calc gives you crank hp unless it says "wheel hp" on it. This means you will have to add another 10% to a calc read out if your running AWD.
A car runs 13 flat with a 2.1 60 ft on run 1 and 12.8 with a 1.8 60 ft. Now a calc this will show differnt hp if it does not include a 60 ft with it.
Now if it was about the awd vs fwd/rwd, the calc gives you crank hp unless it says "wheel hp" on it. This means you will have to add another 10% to a calc read out if your running AWD.
Trending Topics
#8
Well you might be close. Your 60 ft was not all that great
off by .2 and your mph is going to go up a bit because of the slower ET. But I still think your very close to 300-320 hp as it is. I have a new computer since my other one died and dont have my calc on this one yet.
#9
well duh. like i wrote, 60' is more about other parts of the drivetrain than the powerplant
of all people you should know. make your own calculator or forget the additional 10%
#10
First off the calcs out there are giving you hp readings for the crank
and a fwd/rwd car is only losing 12-15% so that is why you add the 10% on top of what they show. The calc I had a choice between fwd and rwd and when you change the setting between those 2 with all the rest of the numbers in the ET hp would change since the rwd has a lower drive line loss over a fwd.