Don't try the Macan...
#41
Great write-up anselmw, thank you!
May be a mundane question, but how would you rate the Macan Turbo on the "everyday driver" scale? Unfortunately, that would be my use at this point. BTW my definition of a good everyday driver may vary significantly from others, but for me, I need a point & shoot, nimble, responsive car. So many "performance" cars, while putting up huge numbers at the track, feel big, lumbering, and tiring in a crowded, hit the hole, accelerate, decelerate agonizing morning commute. The Q5 3.0T is the first vehicle I've owned that isn't actually a car that fits the bill. Has the Macan maintained that livability?
May be a mundane question, but how would you rate the Macan Turbo on the "everyday driver" scale? Unfortunately, that would be my use at this point. BTW my definition of a good everyday driver may vary significantly from others, but for me, I need a point & shoot, nimble, responsive car. So many "performance" cars, while putting up huge numbers at the track, feel big, lumbering, and tiring in a crowded, hit the hole, accelerate, decelerate agonizing morning commute. The Q5 3.0T is the first vehicle I've owned that isn't actually a car that fits the bill. Has the Macan maintained that livability?
#42
I agree SQ5 is better in terms of utility but the trunk is not that much bigger than the macan without moving the rear seat forward if you leave the cargo cover on for both. Our Q5 trunk liner was almost a perfect fit in the Macan trunk. If you move the seat in the Q5 back to the normal position. The only difference comes from the angled hatch on the macan. I think the macan trunk might be 2cft smaller. I can tell as we can almost put the same amount of stuff in both.
Last edited by anselmw; 08-12-2014 at 01:16 PM.
#43
I kind of chuckle internally when anyone talks about the (S)Q5 in terms of being a performance car. It's not.
#44
AudiWorld Expert
#45
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
17.1 cu ft for the Macan is under the Cargo cover as Porsche doesn't expect anyone to stack cargo above it (even though there is plenty of room as you get closer to the back of the rear seat.
2014 Audi Q5 - Quattro 4dr Features & Specs | Autonet
#46
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're correct....the SQ5 is not a performance car....it is however a CUV that performs quite well. Any vehicle that will go 0-60 in five seconds with decent handling is a vehicle to be reckoned with. Of course It's not for the track but I can tell you for a fact that it will quickly get you through those clusters of mopey drivers who seem to love stay in a clump on an otherwise clear freeway.
I didn't since that's not my goal with my Q5, but they run about $1500-$2200 installed. Plenty of threads on coilovers...more sporty handling, lower ride height, at the expense of comfort.
I kind of chuckle internally when anyone talks about the (S)Q5 in terms of being a performance car. It's not.
I kind of chuckle internally when anyone talks about the (S)Q5 in terms of being a performance car. It's not.
Last edited by USAVAGEU; 08-15-2014 at 06:59 AM.
#47
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're correct....the SQ5 is not a performance car....it is however a CUV that performs quite well. Any vehicle that will go 0-60 in five seconds with decent handling is a vehicle to be reckoned with. Of course It's not for the track but I can tell you for a fact that it will quickly get you through those clusters of mopey drivers who seem to love stay in a clump on an otherwise clear freeway.
#48
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NW Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In that same vein, and slightly tongue in cheek...I'm still waiting for a manufacturer to make a decent performing minivan and advertise it as such. My sense is there are a lot of acceleration-starved soccer Dads out there who'd ante up for something a little more exciting than vanilla box on (undersized) wheels.
#49
AudiWorld Member
You're correct....the SQ5 is not a performance car....it is however a CUV that performs quite well. Any vehicle that will go 0-60 in five seconds with decent handling is a vehicle to be reckoned with. Of course It's not for the track but I can tell you for a fact that it will quickly get you through those clusters of mopey drivers who seem to love stay in a clump on an otherwise clear freeway.
My SQ5's interior is just like my buddy's S4, except you could wear a Farrell hat if you were so inclined.
Last edited by SQive; 08-16-2014 at 09:53 AM.
#50
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nazareth, PA
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SQ5 is certainly a special car. It sits squarely in the middle of the Macan and Cayenne; it out-accelerates all models of both vehicles except the turbos, but the turbos cost significantly more money than the SQ5. The SQ5 is bigger than the Macan, but has a rear seat that is only slightly smaller than the Cayenne (but the cayenne's cargo area is bigger).
I don't agree with those that say the Porsche interior is better. I had a 2011 Cayenne and the plastic was extremely creaky. The SQ5 interior, esp with the two-tone napa leather is very sharp. The reality is that Porsche and Audi use much of the same switch gear (Porsche SE is the majority shareholder of VW).
Lastly, those that say the Porsche handling is better, they are only halfway right; the Porsches offer superior suspensions (for a price) than the SQ5, but in base trim, they are not far apart. All of these cars will do great in the public road twisties; if you want a track car, don't get an SUV.
All of these cars are great, but the Audi certainly provides the best value.
I don't agree with those that say the Porsche interior is better. I had a 2011 Cayenne and the plastic was extremely creaky. The SQ5 interior, esp with the two-tone napa leather is very sharp. The reality is that Porsche and Audi use much of the same switch gear (Porsche SE is the majority shareholder of VW).
Lastly, those that say the Porsche handling is better, they are only halfway right; the Porsches offer superior suspensions (for a price) than the SQ5, but in base trim, they are not far apart. All of these cars will do great in the public road twisties; if you want a track car, don't get an SUV.
All of these cars are great, but the Audi certainly provides the best value.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bahn S4
NY / NJ / CT Discussion
13
09-20-2008 09:07 PM
German Driver
NY / NJ / CT Discussion
2
08-31-2006 11:07 AM
ravidrabbit
Audi 5000 / 200 / V8 Discussion
6
03-02-2003 08:35 AM