Q7 MKII Discussion Discussion forum for the Audi Q7 MKII built from 2016 -

Driving a new loaner 2.0 Q7 from dealer and..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2019, 05:34 PM
  #21  
AudiWorld Super User
 
SYMAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 0
Received 234 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whyman
is DC mostly flat terrain??

Trying driving Q7 2.0 up and down constant differentiating terrain, the 2.0 will reallllly struggle
Maybe that's why the 2.0 sells well in my area, it's mostly flat and traffic. Last month where I work we sold twice as many 2.0 as we did 3.0.
Old 06-10-2019, 06:57 PM
  #22  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
PistolPeteEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sickk23
The 3.0 Q7 definitely has different power delivery, not having a turbo. But at WOT it’s significantly faster. My 2016 X5 35i feels significantly faster than my 3.0 Q7 but on paper the Q7 lays down 0-60 about half a second quicker. Seat of pants feel is like 2 seconds slower if I had to guess in the Q7 but numbers don’t lie.

I think the 3.0 is very refined and the power is there when you put the pedal down. Otherwise it feels pretty average.

One of the biggest things I’ve noticed is the ZF feels nearly identical to our Grand Cherokee w/Hemi. The ZF in the X5 feels nothing like the other two. It’s sharper always, bangs the shifts in Sport+. I think that’s a lot why the Q seems a bit more relaxed, but it’s tricking you still hauling *** in a more buttoned up fashion. I’m coming to love it
I had an X5 that I sold and moved to the Q7. I agree. X5 must stay in sport plus mode at all times. I enjoyed it better for commuting, but love the Q7 for long hauls so much more. The ZF is butter in the Q, and does deceive you. I think it's partly due to the supercharger helping to get up and go, and smoothing out the shifts. The BMW turbo lag was getting annoying, as all turbo lag is...
Old 06-10-2019, 07:10 PM
  #23  
AudiWorld Member
 
sickk23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 396
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

^^Glad I’m not the only one that got fed up with the turbo.
Old 06-10-2019, 07:16 PM
  #24  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
PistolPeteEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sickk23
^^Glad I’m not the only one that got fed up with the turbo.
I bought a Porsche 718 last year and hated the turbo 4 banger after two months. Sold it within a year...NA or Superchargers for me... Even better...EV!!!
Old 06-11-2019, 05:23 AM
  #25  
AudiWorld Member
 
randomman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 54
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whyman
is DC mostly flat terrain??

Trying driving Q7 2.0 up and down constant differentiating terrain, the 2.0 will reallllly struggle
Good point. DC is almost completely flat. I can imagine it would struggle (and be very loud) going uphill).

I also notice the 3.0 doesn't have to downshift to give me power to merge onto the highway.

End of the day, I'm happy with my decision to get the 2.0.
Old 06-11-2019, 09:20 AM
  #26  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Blake P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 1,170
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

When I was shopping for my Q7, I completely dismissed the 2.0T as a viable option. Then I found a CPO 2.0T in the exact color and options I was looking for, so I test drove it and was pleasantly surprised. It wasn't nearly as underpowered as I imagined coming from the previous gen 3.0T Q7. To me, it was completely worth it and I haven't regretted my purchase one bit.
Old 06-11-2019, 10:22 AM
  #27  
AudiWorld Member
 
samps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 235
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

We have a 2.0T in our 2014 Q5 (220HP vs the new 252HP). I had regretted getting the 2.0T even after having test driven it and the 3.0T in the Q5 - living with the 2.0T day to day showed just how underpowered it us for me personally. As such, the 2.0T in our Q7 was never an option, despite the fact there is more power. I have a Neuspeed Power Module for the Q5 that makes it bearable.

I will say that if we end up getting a newer Q5 at some point, the new 2.0T will likely be satisfactory. I get it only comes with that now, so we wouldn't have a choice but point is - the new 2.0T might be acceptable in the Q5, but I think it's much too small in the Q7.

For those that did end up with the 2.0T in the Q7 and think it's underpowered - consider a Neuspeed Power Module or something similar - will likely help.
Old 06-11-2019, 12:20 PM
  #28  
AudiWorld Super User
 
BigKutta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Washington DC burbs
Posts: 2,629
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by samps
We have a 2.0T in our 2014 Q5 (220HP vs the new 252HP). I had regretted getting the 2.0T even after having test driven it and the 3.0T in the Q5 - living with the 2.0T day to day showed just how underpowered it us for me personally. As such, the 2.0T in our Q7 was never an option, despite the fact there is more power. I have a Neuspeed Power Module for the Q5 that makes it bearable.

I will say that if we end up getting a newer Q5 at some point, the new 2.0T will likely be satisfactory. I get it only comes with that now, so we wouldn't have a choice but point is - the new 2.0T might be acceptable in the Q5, but I think it's much too small in the Q7.

For those that did end up with the 2.0T in the Q7 and think it's underpowered - consider a Neuspeed Power Module or something similar - will likely help.
You'll find the the new 2.0 is perfect for the new Q5. I've driven it a couple of times as a loaner, and it feels good and (relatively) quick
Old 06-11-2019, 01:43 PM
  #29  
AudiWorld Newcomer
 
Fleetwood51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a Q5 2.0 and a Q7 2.0 very happy with both. A daley driver more than enough power.If your going to tow,I can see the 3.0.spend the 6.000 on the options.No oil and fuel rail problems and front end a lot lighter.In my Q5 I have Bang and Olson sound system.Q7 Audi sistem sounds the same,my opinion don't spend the 4.000 A waste.
Old 06-11-2019, 03:47 PM
  #30  
AudiWorld Member
 
sickk23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 396
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

^^Not a waste at all. I didn’t buy a luxury vehicle to get the stripper version. 3.0 prestige w/ adaptive chassis is where it’s at.


Quick Reply: Driving a new loaner 2.0 Q7 from dealer and..



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.