S4 Now avaialbe only with automatic torque converter
#3
AudiWorld Member
all the speculation I've heard: the dsg in the previous s4 didn't have enough torque capacity that audi was comfortable with (not enough engineering reliability/safety margin left), they didn't want to spend the resources to invest in a new design, too many people complained about the roughness of the dsg, and the zf8 they are using now shifts fast enough and fits the market slotting for the s4.
it is odd the rs5 has a torque converter too though, given the main competition (M3/M4) has a dual clutch which are sharper and shifts faster than the zf8s.
it is odd the rs5 has a torque converter too though, given the main competition (M3/M4) has a dual clutch which are sharper and shifts faster than the zf8s.
#4
AudiWorld Member
all the speculation I've heard: the dsg in the previous s4 didn't have enough torque capacity that audi was comfortable with (not enough engineering reliability/safety margin left), they didn't want to spend the resources to invest in a new design, too many people complained about the roughness of the dsg, and the zf8 they are using now shifts fast enough and fits the market slotting for the s4.
it is odd the rs5 has a torque converter too though, given the main competition (M3/M4) has a dual clutch which are sharper and shifts faster than the zf8s.
it is odd the rs5 has a torque converter too though, given the main competition (M3/M4) has a dual clutch which are sharper and shifts faster than the zf8s.
If you haven't driven it, don't judge.
It's still damn good.
Not quite as quick or smooth, but same trans in multiple vehicles and platforms.
Haven't heard of many ZF8 failures as opposed to all of the DSG failures, in comparison.
Less servicing required for the ZF8 too.
take it or leave it.
gr
#5
AudiWorld Super User
all the speculation I've heard: the dsg in the previous s4 didn't have enough torque capacity that audi was comfortable with (not enough engineering reliability/safety margin left), they didn't want to spend the resources to invest in a new design, too many people complained about the roughness of the dsg, and the zf8 they are using now shifts fast enough and fits the market slotting for the s4.
it is odd the rs5 has a torque converter too though, given the main competition (M3/M4) has a dual clutch which are sharper and shifts faster than the zf8s.
it is odd the rs5 has a torque converter too though, given the main competition (M3/M4) has a dual clutch which are sharper and shifts faster than the zf8s.
340xi m sports, C43, are the S4/S5 main rivals
I get to drive all these cars on a daily basis. I have unlimited access to an RS3 and my S4. The more "traditional" slushbox in the S4 simply suits the cars overall character much better. Yes, it's a tad less engaging, but it's also smoother. Having held my pro license for a long time, and a longtime manual transmission owner, I still can't shift as quickly, or most importantly, as consistently, as the auto in the S4 (and other cars of it's ilk) can.
Last edited by SCarGuy; 01-05-2019 at 05:48 AM.
#6
Permanent S Mode Member
Except an M3 and M4 are really not S car competitors, but rather RS car competitors.
340xi m sports, C43, are the S4/S5 main rivals
I get to drive all these cars on a daily basis. I have unlimited access to an RS3 and my S4. The more "traditional" slushbox in the S4 simply suits the cars overall character much better. Yes, it's a tad less engaging, but it's also smoother. Having held my pro license for a long time, and a longtime manual transmission owner, I still can't shift as quickly, or most importantly, as consistently, as the auto in the S4 (and other cars of it's ilk) can.
340xi m sports, C43, are the S4/S5 main rivals
I get to drive all these cars on a daily basis. I have unlimited access to an RS3 and my S4. The more "traditional" slushbox in the S4 simply suits the cars overall character much better. Yes, it's a tad less engaging, but it's also smoother. Having held my pro license for a long time, and a longtime manual transmission owner, I still can't shift as quickly, or most importantly, as consistently, as the auto in the S4 (and other cars of it's ilk) can.
#7
AudiWorld Super User
yep, I use the paddles in the S4 with some regularity, and I too go for the clutch too occassionally lol....though my last manual is still relatively fresh in my brain, as it was my trusty GTi (sold last year, but with me for 10 yrs)
Trending Topics
#8
AudiWorld Super User
Same.
If you haven't driven it, don't judge.
It's still damn good.
Not quite as quick or smooth, but same trans in multiple vehicles and platforms.
Haven't heard of many ZF8 failures as opposed to all of the DSG failures, in comparison.
Less servicing required for the ZF8 too.
take it or leave it.
gr
If you haven't driven it, don't judge.
It's still damn good.
Not quite as quick or smooth, but same trans in multiple vehicles and platforms.
Haven't heard of many ZF8 failures as opposed to all of the DSG failures, in comparison.
Less servicing required for the ZF8 too.
take it or leave it.
gr
#9
AudiWorld Member
I didn't compare 'S' to 'M', it was 'RS' to 'M. the new rs5 has a torque converter trans. the next gen m3/m4 is coming soon, wonder if they will stick with dual clutch or follow audi's lead in cost reduction.
Last edited by will13k7; 01-05-2019 at 10:45 AM.
#10
AudiWorld Super User