What's another late night without another FATS result? 4.64 with full block 003 Data:
 

All the same as before, 3/4 tank, 72 degrees.

Time (s);[003] Engine Speed (/min);[003] Air Mass (g/s);[003] Throttle Angle (%);[003] Ignition Angle (°v. OT)

37.43;4160;222.5;100.0;12.7
37.74;4320;223.1;100.0;12.0
38.05;4520;221.5;100.0;10.5
38.37;4720;228.1;100.0;15.0
38.70;4880;237.0;100.0;15.7
39.04;5040;245.7;100.0;16.5
39.38;5240;255.0;100.0;17.2
39.72;5440;259.7;100.0;15.0
40.08;5600;260.2;100.0;17.2
40.43;5800;260.2;100.0;20.2
40.80;5960;256.8;100.0;16.5
41.17;6120;255.8;100.0;21.7
41.54;6240;255.8;100.0;21.0
41.92;6400;257.7;100.0;21.7
42.29;6560;259.5;100.0;21.0

= 4.64

this FATs thing is getting boring ... 2 local S4 guys got a fat ticket over the weekend

That sucks...the stretch of highway I do the run on is always cop free (no u-turn spots either).

2nd, just street race some fast car on video for comparo's sake from now on :)

:p

damn pussys lol

I agree.

its not really supposed to be entertaining though, more of a way to get an idea of the general
 

health of your car.

True, but I think after ~5 identical FATs posts in a week, its pointless.

Too much variance IMO. People here are splitting it down to the hundredth of a second and the
 

margin of error and variability is much higher than that. I would take any difference under 0.3 seconds with a grain of salt.