SQ7 - why not quicker?
#1
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
SQ7 - why not quicker?
The SQ7 looks amazing - 6kW electric supercharger on top of twin-turbodiesel. Sad we don't have it in the US.
I do wonder though:
X5M is 567 HP 553 torque and 0-60 in 3.8. 5299 lbs.
¼-mile: 12.3 sec
SQ7 is 435 HP 663 torque and 0-60 in 5.1. 5250 lbs.
Standing ¼-mile: 13.6 sec
Why is the 0-60 and 1/4 mile so much worse than the X5M?
5.1 is not all that much better than the regular Q7 which is 5.5 (according to C/D) and 14.2.
I do wonder though:
X5M is 567 HP 553 torque and 0-60 in 3.8. 5299 lbs.
¼-mile: 12.3 sec
SQ7 is 435 HP 663 torque and 0-60 in 5.1. 5250 lbs.
Standing ¼-mile: 13.6 sec
Why is the 0-60 and 1/4 mile so much worse than the X5M?
5.1 is not all that much better than the regular Q7 which is 5.5 (according to C/D) and 14.2.
Last edited by rsilvers129; 07-23-2017 at 08:12 AM.
#2
AudiWorld Senior Member
As you have observed the numbers don't tell the whole story. There's so many other factors here. How many gears, what's the gear ratio, when does the top power kick in, what's the power curve, what's the turbo lag, what's the traction like, size of the contact patch, stickiness of the tires, etc... Also, there is 132HP difference between the two (regardless the torque) .....
#4
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
#5
AudiWorld Member
What people don't really realize is that bmw's "M" cars are equivalent to audi's "RS" models. Audi's "S" models are equivalent to the bigger-engined BMW Models like the SQ7 is equivalent to the BMW X5 50i, S4 = 340i, S5 = 440i, and so on.
#6
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Riga, Latvia
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SQ7 looks amazing - 6kW electric supercharger on top of twin-turbodiesel. Sad we don't have it in the US.
I do wonder though:
X5M is 567 HP 553 torque and 0-60 in 3.8. 5299 lbs.
¼-mile: 12.3 sec
SQ7 is 435 HP 663 torque and 0-60 in 5.1. 5250 lbs.
Standing ¼-mile: 13.6 sec
Why is the 0-60 and 1/4 mile so much worse than the X5M?
5.1 is not all that much better than the regular Q7 which is 5.5 (according to C/D) and 14.2.
I do wonder though:
X5M is 567 HP 553 torque and 0-60 in 3.8. 5299 lbs.
¼-mile: 12.3 sec
SQ7 is 435 HP 663 torque and 0-60 in 5.1. 5250 lbs.
Standing ¼-mile: 13.6 sec
Why is the 0-60 and 1/4 mile so much worse than the X5M?
5.1 is not all that much better than the regular Q7 which is 5.5 (according to C/D) and 14.2.
Torque is capability to perform certain job. As HP for X5M is higher, also 1/4 mile time is better.
Trending Topics
#8
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
I told my friend that, and he said BS. That a company would never do that.
Does anyone have any actual evidence that this is true? I searched the internet, and cannot find any dyno test that shows it to be true.
But online 1/4 estimators think the X5M would need 100 more HP than it is rated to get its 12.2 time. So that is an indication that it may be true.
Does anyone have any actual evidence that this is true? I searched the internet, and cannot find any dyno test that shows it to be true.
But online 1/4 estimators think the X5M would need 100 more HP than it is rated to get its 12.2 time. So that is an indication that it may be true.
Last edited by rsilvers129; 07-25-2017 at 12:13 PM.
#9
AudiWorld Senior Member
I don't care....
I just HOPE AND PRAY that they bring it to the USA! BMW....BAVARIAN MANURE WAGON.... I had a 633 CS...it was fast, and it was almost ALWAYS broken...looked very pretty sitting in the drive though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JKAUDI
A4 (B7 Platform) Discussion
6
04-21-2007 07:55 PM
a62.7t4ceo
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
7
03-21-2005 01:18 PM
Sonakanji
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
2
01-28-2003 10:39 PM
audio-0
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
4
11-12-2000 03:12 PM