Q7 MKII Discussion Discussion forum for the Audi Q7 MKII built from 2016 -

SQ7 - why not quicker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2017, 07:56 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rsilvers129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default SQ7 - why not quicker?

The SQ7 looks amazing - 6kW electric supercharger on top of twin-turbodiesel. Sad we don't have it in the US.

I do wonder though:

X5M is 567 HP 553 torque and 0-60 in 3.8. 5299 lbs.
¼-mile: 12.3 sec

SQ7 is 435 HP 663 torque and 0-60 in 5.1. 5250 lbs.
Standing ¼-mile: 13.6 sec

Why is the 0-60 and 1/4 mile so much worse than the X5M?

5.1 is not all that much better than the regular Q7 which is 5.5 (according to C/D) and 14.2.

Last edited by rsilvers129; 07-23-2017 at 08:12 AM.
Old 07-23-2017, 08:14 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
gsobol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 102 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

As you have observed the numbers don't tell the whole story. There's so many other factors here. How many gears, what's the gear ratio, when does the top power kick in, what's the power curve, what's the turbo lag, what's the traction like, size of the contact patch, stickiness of the tires, etc... Also, there is 132HP difference between the two (regardless the torque) .....
Old 07-23-2017, 08:20 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rsilvers129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I think the Audi is about what it should be, and the BMW is just way ahead of what it should be able to do.
Old 07-23-2017, 06:31 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rsilvers129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

This says 4.9 from 0-62.

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review...i-sq7-review-0
Old 07-23-2017, 07:09 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Member
 
Mjship2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

What people don't really realize is that bmw's "M" cars are equivalent to audi's "RS" models. Audi's "S" models are equivalent to the bigger-engined BMW Models like the SQ7 is equivalent to the BMW X5 50i, S4 = 340i, S5 = 440i, and so on.
Old 07-24-2017, 02:55 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Member
 
Atvars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Riga, Latvia
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsilvers129
The SQ7 looks amazing - 6kW electric supercharger on top of twin-turbodiesel. Sad we don't have it in the US.

I do wonder though:

X5M is 567 HP 553 torque and 0-60 in 3.8. 5299 lbs.
¼-mile: 12.3 sec

SQ7 is 435 HP 663 torque and 0-60 in 5.1. 5250 lbs.
Standing ¼-mile: 13.6 sec

Why is the 0-60 and 1/4 mile so much worse than the X5M?

5.1 is not all that much better than the regular Q7 which is 5.5 (according to C/D) and 14.2.
HP is how quickly job can be performed.
Torque is capability to perform certain job. As HP for X5M is higher, also 1/4 mile time is better.
Old 07-25-2017, 12:02 PM
  #7  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
AUDI1880's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BMW is notorious for underrating their power outputs. More power than advertised.
Old 07-25-2017, 12:10 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rsilvers129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I told my friend that, and he said BS. That a company would never do that.

Does anyone have any actual evidence that this is true? I searched the internet, and cannot find any dyno test that shows it to be true.

But online 1/4 estimators think the X5M would need 100 more HP than it is rated to get its 12.2 time. So that is an indication that it may be true.

Last edited by rsilvers129; 07-25-2017 at 12:13 PM.
Old 07-25-2017, 02:26 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
flynavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: calif.
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Default I don't care....

I just HOPE AND PRAY that they bring it to the USA! BMW....BAVARIAN MANURE WAGON.... I had a 633 CS...it was fast, and it was almost ALWAYS broken...looked very pretty sitting in the drive though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JKAUDI
A4 (B7 Platform) Discussion
6
04-21-2007 07:55 PM
a62.7t4ceo
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
7
03-21-2005 01:18 PM
Sonakanji
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
2
01-28-2003 10:39 PM
Marc Collins
A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion
18
04-05-2002 11:25 AM
audio-0
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
4
11-12-2000 03:12 PM



Quick Reply: SQ7 - why not quicker?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.