TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Anyone have trouble with a Garrett or APR chip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2002, 11:20 AM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Lust4-ImolaS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Anyone have trouble with a Garrett or APR chip?

I was talking with my Audi mechanic/tuner this morning about my plans to chip my 180TTQC. He winced when I told him that I just sent my ECU out for a Garrett chip. I asked him why, and he said that both Garrett and APR chips go beyond the limits that the engine can handle. He stated that a couple of customers had major engine problems due to these chips (I can't quite remember what the problems were off hand). My question is, has anyone here experience problems with their chips, which chip, and how many miles have you had it installed approx.
Old 05-20-2002, 11:25 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
mtbracr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default If your mechanic said that, I would find a new mechanic...

The new Garrett X-chip would maybe make your 180 TT up to 210 HP. The 225 TT comes stock with 225 HP (Obviously). With more mods, you can get significantely more than that number. The software is not the problem.
Old 05-20-2002, 11:25 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Merou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I have the APR on a 180 FWD...

... and it throws a "system too lean" fault code, which I don't get without the chip. Note that the car drives anyway and is a lot stronger with the chip in, and it didn't do any damage, but my CEL comes on with the chip in.
I need to get my MAF looked at, but since I don't get the CEL without the chip, I can't take it to the dealer with the fault code on... darn.

It's not going to damage the engine, unless you put the wrong gas in (say, 87 on the 93 program). A good investment IMHO.
Old 05-20-2002, 11:36 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
FROMA42TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default He's been trained well... True if abused, a 1.1 bar rate can...

hurt the engine over the long haul, but so can the stock program.
Old 05-20-2002, 11:36 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
RobbyTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

NR: You've got some mail from me
Old 05-20-2002, 11:42 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
FROMA42TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Keep in mind Imola, the 225tt has a larger turbo and with software upgrades

get up in the 250 hp range. My buddy's has this and other options too. Pulleys, short shifter, intake.... Car runs awesome so far!
Old 05-20-2002, 11:49 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Merou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so do you
Old 05-20-2002, 12:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
RobbyTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

back at you...
Old 05-20-2002, 01:14 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Alf Garnett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 5,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Chip to engine related issues on this forum have been almost nonexsistent

Now thats not to say folks havent had em..But we are probably the 1% of TT owners out there who actually chip thier cars and I personally have seen no evidence of Chip damage to motor posts in all my time here.

Marcus
Old 05-20-2002, 04:28 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Duffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Both Garrett and APR are responsible - APR is even more conservative and they will tell you

that every chip they make is well within the range that the engine can handle -- now other companies may not be able to say --


Quick Reply: Anyone have trouble with a Garrett or APR chip?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:19 PM.