TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

At least Car & Driver put the correct car in front in the pic.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2002, 11:27 AM
  #1  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OTOF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 29,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default At least Car & Driver put the correct car in front in the pic.

<center><img src="http://www.caranddriver.com/image_cache/DATA/Caranddriver/images/2002/december/0212_hottin_away.jpg"></center><p>
Old 11-20-2002, 11:29 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
KimTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Look at that ugly butt on the Z!
Old 11-20-2002, 11:34 AM
  #3  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OTOF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 29,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just for you, Kim ;-D
Old 11-20-2002, 11:35 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Jason Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Arg, its a 180hp....they should used a 225...geez
Old 11-20-2002, 11:46 AM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
 
ArchitecTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Still ranks among the most useless comparisons they've ever done.

Did they actually imagine a fictional buyer out there wrestling with the decision between these 4 cars, configured as they were?
Old 11-20-2002, 12:02 PM
  #6  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OTOF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 29,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agree, really stoooopid.
Old 11-20-2002, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
JaminTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Face it everyone of those cars would wip your @ss in a race
Old 11-20-2002, 12:08 PM
  #8  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OTOF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 29,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ummm, that wasn't my point. Thank you for sharing!
Old 11-20-2002, 12:12 PM
  #9  
New Member
 
MoroBluMTM265's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Proof that magazines respond to ad dollars.

That test is living proof that when a new car comes out and the manufacturer pays big bucks in ads on the magazine, they will tailor a test that allows the new product to show off.
However this test takes the cake.
The 350Z still would have beaten a 225TQ in performance numbers but it would it
have been closer and more respectable, I still think the Audi is much classier and elegant, plus a $600 chip on the 225 will overcome the performance deficit.
The S2000 in this test was suspiciously slow, the Mach One was totally out of place, a Boxster should have been included and a Z4 3.0i also.
And since the TT was a 2002, what about the Z3 3.0i coupe?
Wait a couple of years when the 350Z ads die down and they will throw the 350Z to the wolves.
Old 11-20-2002, 12:13 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Bluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

your kidding right.


Quick Reply: At least Car & Driver put the correct car in front in the pic.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 AM.