TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

This is why you shouldn't be using K&N and similar aftermarket air filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2006, 10:00 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
esanmiguel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default This is why you shouldn't be using K&N and similar aftermarket air filters

Don't believe the hype. I Used K&amp;N from previous cars, the small amount of hp gain (or loss) is not worth it vs. longevity of your engine. but for the TT I will stay stock since I plan on keeping this car for many years. I just don't know how they can claim that their filters are better than oem.. Lots of technical reading but interesting results nevertheless.<ul><li><a href="http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm">Air filter study</a></li></ul>
Old 02-24-2006, 11:02 PM
  #2  
Member
 
JettaTT Love Child's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Interesting!
Old 02-25-2006, 02:34 AM
  #3  
New Member
 
MoreBoost!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I have only ever had two engine failures in my life-BOTH the result of dirt ingestion

One was a Chevy 400 smallblock which had a hole in the K &amp; N filter, the second was a Nissan truck which had the wrong air filter installed in it.

I bought both of those cars used and didn't find the filter problems until after I had bought them.

Expensive mistakes.
Old 02-25-2006, 03:51 AM
  #4  
New Member
 
LuvmyAmuleTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default B.S. I have been using K&N filters is all my vehicles for years.....

and have never had a problem. My vehicles breathe easier and the fuel mileage on my 2004 Ford F250 6ltr Diesel went from 14 mpg to 20mpg. I would like to know if the "test" done was using a properly oiled K&amp;N filter or not, it makes a difference
Old 02-25-2006, 04:11 AM
  #5  
Member
 
petervan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As for gains? marginal..at best. Many ultra high HP TT's run stock looking air intake
Old 02-25-2006, 04:18 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
fredfromny's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FWIW APR recommends stock air filter for stage 3
Old 02-25-2006, 05:02 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
blackfnTTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Interesting, although the data is over a year and a half old, I imagine lots.....

have changed since then, could be worse, could be better.
Old 02-25-2006, 05:04 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
SereniTTy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SO GM spnsors a test that proves that the GM brand (AC Delco) filter is the best?
Old 02-25-2006, 05:43 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
TighTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 12,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 165K miles on my A4...K&N its entire life....runs 22+ PSI with a T28 turbo all day long...

dyno'd at 288whp on a mustang dyno. If used properly )oiled with not TOO much oil) K&amp;N's are superior to paper filters.
Old 02-25-2006, 05:44 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
TighTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 12,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock *looking*. Many use a stock airbox *looking* intake with a K&amp;N tucked inside.


Quick Reply: This is why you shouldn't be using K&N and similar aftermarket air filters



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 AM.