TT (Mk3) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk3 Audi TT, TT-S and TT-RS Coupe & Roadster produced from 2014- present

New 2019 TT Reiview

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2019, 11:18 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Member
 
95wildtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 112
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shadeofnardogray
Only things the Steath RT was missing compared to the VR4/GTO, IIRC, were the active aero and adaptive suspension. Car's a gem, thanks for keeping it alive.
It's only got 38k miles on it, and FYI... it does have the adaptive suspension, or it did, now it has an active coil-over from Tein.
Not bad for a 25 year old car, this November...


Sorry, off topic... back to the TTRS review.

Last edited by 95wildtt; 05-13-2019 at 11:43 AM.
Old 05-13-2019, 10:19 PM
  #12  
AudiWorld Member
 
shadeofnardogray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 62
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

That is a gorgeous specimen. Well done sir. I have the EDFC-A's on the MR2, contemplating it for the VR4 as well.
The post 1994.5 cars were a different story - those did have some more toys while the VR4 actually lost some. Downfall of the Japanese supercar and all. Mine wears the bloody-hard-to-find 1998 face, but is a 1991 car with the AWS unfortunately deleted due to some new "salt" they started using a few years back eating the hydraulic lines running down the chassis. Your car is rather rare - late model RT's are not easy to find even among the rest of the GTO family.

In regards to the TT's sales - Audi doesn't promote it. While i admittedly have all the pop culture acumen of a sea cucumber, the only thing i ever see them place in movies/tv is the R8 or in an effort to pour salt into the laceration which was endgame, the e-tron (vroom vroom anyone?).
All of the automotive publications are using the M2 as a benchmark of athleticism because "its engaging" and Audi is doing nothing to actively promote its vastly superior platform as engaging when used effectively - which it very much is (engagement is not measured by how fast your sphincter turns a lump of coal to diamond or whether you can touch your bumpers together around a stationary object).
Consider the new i5 setup - all the hallmarks of a race motor, but cammed and limited to 7k with a conservative boost/fuel and ignition map for its 10 injector dual fuel system on a turbo capable of 2 bar... If there was no R8, or if the R8 didn't have to "not outperform the Lambo/Bugatti/etc," then the TTRS could easily be bumped to a direct GTR/m3 competitor with some class in its swagger while the TTS 2.0 could be used to shame the Bavarians as they did for the 420 motor.
I need to find out for sure, but my sense is that this should already be right about at the M3 level on a fair track due to the chassis control toys, so not having that in their lineup will leave an entire market segment to the competition - not having an answer to a vette/gt3/m3/gtr seems like an amateur move for an established company. Would sort of make Audi "the upscale Volvo." R8 already feels like a mid-engine volvo...
Old 05-28-2019, 08:10 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
A6S4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 426
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Vegas roadster — having just replaced my 2013 TTS containing Revo Stage 1 and MSS springs with a 2018 TTS loaded with all options sans fixed suspension, I hold a similar opinion on the missing “fun factor” of the MK 3. But on the other hand, this 2018 is upgraded and refined in every way. It is better for the long haul, deceptively fast, and almost ready for the 034 Stage 1 and lowering springs. Maybe by September...?
Old 06-05-2019, 06:24 AM
  #14  
AudiWorld Member
 
ourlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hopatcong NJ 2017 Ibis TT
Posts: 482
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I come from an 09 miata with $10k in mods. The “engagement” factor is DIFFERENT, but not LESS IMHO. I daily drove the miata for 7 years, used ear plugs on longer trips, and miss the car. It was hardcore. As for the TT engagement, I was not engaged in stock form, but knew I’d do mods. I wonder reviewers opinions if they drove my car as currently set up : MSS Sport, rear sway, REMUS cat back, big brakes, lightweight wheels and a JB4. After CPO I’m keeping the little turbo but having UM do the ECU/TCU/Haldex tunes. It will be a whole new experience. I love my TT, it’s gorgeous, rare, comfy (6’1” 220lbs) infinitely moddable and very affordable. I may add another “more pure” RWD car in 5-7 years but I’m never selling this one.

Last edited by ourlee; 06-05-2019 at 06:31 AM.
Old 06-05-2019, 01:38 PM
  #15  
AudiWorld Member
 
Gbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 398
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Nice post Ourlee,
I, too, owned a Mk 1 Miata- a '92. I sold it almost 20 years later. It was a great car.
But, the TTS really spoiled me.
If I had my druthers, I would have kept my MK2 TTS instead of getting the MK3. Though I like the Audi Cockpit, and the increased horsepower, I still remember how much better the Bose sound system sounded, as well as the beautiful Magma Orange paint.
That B&O system really sucks, and my Silver paint job is just okay- though at least it doesn't show dirt.
Bob
Old 06-05-2019, 04:23 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Lookout57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 641
Received 85 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I find the B&O in my TT RS to sound so much better than the Blose in my A7 but not as good as the B&O in the Q7.
Old 06-08-2019, 04:25 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Member
 
J-Fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 134
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ourlee
I come from an 09 miata with $10k in mods. The “engagement” factor is DIFFERENT, but not LESS IMHO. I daily drove the miata for 7 years, used ear plugs on longer trips, and miss the car. It was hardcore. As for the TT engagement, I was not engaged in stock form, but knew I’d do mods. I wonder reviewers opinions if they drove my car as currently set up : MSS Sport, rear sway, REMUS cat back, big brakes, lightweight wheels and a JB4. After CPO I’m keeping the little turbo but having UM do the ECU/TCU/Haldex tunes. It will be a whole new experience. I love my TT, it’s gorgeous, rare, comfy (6’1” 220lbs) infinitely moddable and very affordable. I may add another “more pure” RWD car in 5-7 years but I’m never selling this one.
I’m just a couple of weeks into my ‘16 TTS and I’m coming from a ‘13 Miata Club that was stock other than a RoadsterSport Super Q exhaust. I miss the open air but Audi made U.S. buyers choose between a base roadster or performance coupe. I’m getting the hang of it but as you know driving a car that was so low to the ground makes the TTS feel like a SUV. Not tail happy like the Miata but the TTS can handle pretty good.
Old 06-18-2019, 02:43 PM
  #18  
AudiWorld Member
 
ourlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hopatcong NJ 2017 Ibis TT
Posts: 482
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I think you and I are the only TT owners who think the TT is GIGANTIC.
Old 06-19-2019, 02:59 AM
  #19  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 3,060
Received 97 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Compared to the Miata it is GIGANTIC, especially in width.

There are days I miss my lineage of sporty Mazda's, but then I drive the TT and all's well.

Originally Posted by ourlee
I think you and I are the only TT owners who think the TT is GIGANTIC.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUDIFANATL
Southeast Discussion
6
03-17-2007 04:53 PM
uropn2
TT (Mk1) Discussion
6
05-18-2004 11:33 AM
BodhisaTTva
TT (Mk1) Discussion
0
09-08-2002 11:42 AM
hoTTub
TT (Mk1) Discussion
9
08-13-2001 07:59 AM



Quick Reply: New 2019 TT Reiview



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 AM.