Wheels & Tires Discussion Discussion forum for all questions and topics regarding wheels and tires

RE960 vs. Proxes 4 vs. ContiExtreme Contact

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2007, 03:46 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
skbt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE960 vs. Proxes 4 vs. ContiExtreme Contact

Hi

I'm considering a set of Bridgestone Potenza RE960AS Pole Position for a 2006 A3 2.0 (not quattro). I'm in Connecticut, so lots of rain driving, and occasional (as of recent years) snow.

Other all-season alternatives (for ~$160 less for a set of 4 OTD) are:

Toyo proxes 4
Continental ContiExtreme Contact

Are the bridgestones worth the extra money? Are these good choices? Any advice would be appreciated.

thanks,
Old 05-31-2007, 06:36 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Expert
 
ex-quattro PETE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 27,109
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default IMO, the Contis would be the best in snow, so if you're not planning on having dedicated winter...

tires, then I would probably go with those.

Any of the above 3 tires will get you through the summer. It's the white stuff that's problematic.
Old 05-31-2007, 07:01 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Expert
 
Reggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Fort Collins Colorado
Posts: 31,634
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

good advice
Old 05-31-2007, 07:21 AM
  #4  
Former Vendor
 
Gary@Tirerack.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Well stated.

I don't know about the Toyo, but as ex-QPete posted the Extreme Contact should be noticably better in snow, while the RE960A/S will have an advantage in dry handling and steering response.<ul><li><a href="http://www.tirerack.com/a.jsp?a=AR8&amp;url=/tires/index.jsp">Tires</a></li></ul>
Old 05-31-2007, 11:18 AM
  #5  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
skbt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Well stated.

Thanks for the advice. On the tirerack site, the RE960 has slightly better snow reviews. See

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/CompareTires.jsp?sortValue=1&amp;resultsNumberSele cted=Y&amp;displayResults=10&amp;compare=true&amp; compareList=1%2C2&amp;RunFlat=All&amp;goWhere=%252 Ftires%252FCompare1.jsp&amp;width=225%2F&amp;ratio =45&amp;diameter=17&amp;performance=UHPAS&amp;star tIndex=0

This may be a statistical artifact due to the relatively few people that reviewed the RE960 in relation to the amount of people that reviewed the Contis.

Do you think this makes a difference?<ul><li><a href="http://www.tirerack.com/a.jsp?a=AR4&url=%2Ftires%2FCompareTires.jsp%3Fsort Value%3D1%26amp%3BresultsNumberSelected%3DY%26amp% 3BdisplayResults%3D10%26amp%3Bcompare%3Dtrue%26amp %3BcompareList%3D1%252C2%26amp%3BRunFlat%3DAll%26a mp%3BgoWh
Old 05-31-2007, 02:13 PM
  #6  
Former Vendor
 
Gary@Tirerack.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Well stated.

Correct. Too few reports on the 960 to fairly compare for snow based on the surveys.
Old 06-01-2007, 03:07 PM
  #7  
Member
 
avant1-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Looking at same choices here...but TR salesman on phone downplayed Contis.

He said that they were an 'inferior product' compared to the RE960s or Yokohama Advan S4s. I'd already told him that I don't need maximum summer performance. So in what way--noticeable to me-- would they be 'inferior?'
Via the TR reviews and surveys, and comments here, the Contis look like a solid choice and a good value. I was really surprised to hear a TR guy badmouth them...especially as they're such a big seller.
I may order them anyway!
Old 06-01-2007, 06:22 PM
  #8  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
skbt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ended up getting the 960s

got a good deal and a free gift<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/a3/threads/21804.phtml#89568">free gift</a></li></ul>
Old 06-06-2007, 10:04 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Member
 
akaEsCo01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default TR is great until you get on the phone with them, some of their reps are full of BS IMHO...

What's funny is when I called about the ContiExtreme Contacts, the rep was raving about them to me like they were the next best thing since sliced bread and now I hear someone downplayed them to you.

I own the tires and tey are a solid tire, I have only had a chance to try them in the wet and dry but I have no doubts they will perform well in light snow
Old 06-06-2007, 05:18 PM
  #10  
Member
 
avant1-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$75/set rebate on 960AS now, so that's what I ordered.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KompletelyBlack
Wheels & Tires Discussion
1
12-12-2010 11:55 AM
Augie05
Wheels & Tires Discussion
4
06-05-2004 06:20 AM
veryfastS4
Wheels & Tires Discussion
2
04-13-2004 10:24 AM
Tbandido
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
8
11-15-2001 11:22 AM
Paul H. (near Annapolis, MD)
Wheels & Tires Discussion
2
06-16-2001 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: RE960 vs. Proxes 4 vs. ContiExtreme Contact



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:50 AM.