Budding Dealer Dilemma to the tune of $12k
My car stalled on me at the traffic light recently while I was away on business. The car had been idling sporadically once I got in the city off the highway and was issue free on the 3 hour car ride up. I tow my car to the nearest dealer and sign the requisite diagnosis repair waiver(waiver stated $150 of diagnosis cost would go toward the repair if I employ their services). I get a call the next day saying the work would be $1000. I give a verbal approval and pick the car up the next day and was met with a repair cost of $12k. The service person said they told me the cost, I told them I didn't hear it and further who gives a person an explanation for $12k repair in under 60 seconds. The service person sticks to his/her guns and claims the correct price was indicated. I stick to mine and said I did not hear such a price. I also indicated why wouldn't sales call me to try to place me in a new 2019/2020 S6 rather than put that kind of money towards a 2013. The service person agrees with my point. The service person also agrees that the explanation he/she gave was to curt to warrant such a dollar amount. I didn't sign off on an estimate, so I never saw a hardcopy via email, text or in person at the dealership. I gave them a verbal OK for a 1000 repair with forthcoming labor.costs.
What do you guys think my next steps should be? The claim they have the call recorded, which they didn't tell me btw, nonetheless from what I recollect it puts them in an even weaker position than had they never recorded a call at all. |
What did they repair?
|
Sounds like the turbos.
|
That’s what I am guessing.
|
Originally Posted by bpd
(Post 25315321)
Sounds like the turbos.
|
In WA state, there are auto repair laws that would apply. You might want to check your State's laws. If they recorded your call, demand to hear it.
https://www.washingtonlawhelp.org/fi...repair-act.pdf |
If there is a recording it will decide the issue in favor of one party or the other depending on what it contains.
|
Originally Posted by KevinGary
(Post 25315472)
If there is a recording it will decide the issue in favor of one party or the other depending on what it contains.
I think I'm good to go with the phone call, but even if I wasn't they never received my consent to a recording per New Jersey law I found this little ditty as well [font]Written and Oral Authorization for Work Performed[/font]Subsection 2 of N.J.A.C. § 13:45A-26C.2 states that no repair work can begin without securing one of the following:
|
Since you only gave them verbal approval for $1,000, which would make the recording great for you, why are you researching law that says NJ is a two party consent state? I would think that you would love for there to be a recording.
|
Originally Posted by KevinGary
(Post 25315934)
Since you only gave them verbal approval for $1,000, which would make the recording great for you, why are you researching law that says NJ is a two party consent state? I would think that you would love for there to be a recording.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands