Some quick pics of the manifold...
 

<center><img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/67160/dsc_8666.jpg"></center><p>http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h302/bizkid225/DSC_8662.jpg

Tried to post both the pics...

pipes seem too big and too long. Unless you are upping your rev limits via more internal changes...
 

You'll have a short and peaky powerband which seems rather useless except for dragstrip.

Right.....;)

Divided tang?

Most tubular setups have longer runners lol......
 

FWIW the ATP log was dynod against the FR tubular, and with a hair of bottom end loss, and ~40hp and 60tq gains.......

I think I found what you are describing
 

There's a big difference in torque around 4K RPM with the log leading the charge, but anything after that, this tubular takes the cake.

Impressive to say the least. I rest my case :D<ul><li><a href="http://www.full-race.com/articles/1.8T_turbo_manifold_test_writeup.pdf">FR 1.8T test results</a></li></ul>

Isn't that what Kareem of WheaTT posted earlier?

If that's what he's describing, that looks like more than a hair of loss @ the bottom.

LOL....OMG.

Reminds me of this.
 

<center><img src="http://www.blueeyedcurse.com/Images/intestines.gif"></center><p>No offense. I'm still a noob.
I like.