Carpoint review of the A6
Evaluating the A6 by combining the results of the A6 3.0L with the S6 (and everything in between) is stupid- hence the "65%" Performance rating.
I can hardly wait he lumps the 525i with the M5.
Trending Topics
I compared his reviews of the 2001 A6 and 5 Series BMW last year and there were several inconsistencies in his methods and results.
I've included the link to my comments on his reviews.<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/a6/msgs/77100.phtml">https://forums.audiworld.com/a6/msgs/77100.phtml</a</li></ul>
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
His performance data for the 2.7T is significantly different between 2001 and 2002. I doubt there is a .5 sec. 1/4 and .4 sec. 0 - 60 time difference between the 2 model years.
I'm wondering if the 2002 car came with Goodyear RSA's like he reports the 2001 came with ;-)
The report card is word-for-word from 2001. Even the "NNoise" typo from 2001 is duplicated in the 2002 report card.
Not only lazy but sloppy too.


