180 Quattro road tested earlier tonight - review
Car driven: 180 BHP TT Quattro - Blue/Blue<p>OK so here goes. I suggest you don’t read this if you are over sensitive about TT’s and have a habit of immediately jumping onto the defensive. These are my comments and opinions and you are entitled to yours. Please feel free to discuss POLITELY.<p>For a bit of background my daily driver is currently (and has been for the past 5 years) a VW Corrado VR6 (V6 2.9 litre, 190 BHP FWD if you didn’t know) and this is the basis for my comparison.<p>Arrived at the dealers at 6.00pm and a Blue 180 Quattro is ready for me. Jump in to the car and adjust seat etc, all is well. Fire up the engine and notice it sounds much larger than a 1.8 and is a little lumpy at idle. The first thing I notice is how short the throw is on the gearlever, and how direct it feels. This is much more like a RWD gearbox feeling - direct, as though the lever is straight into the ‘box. Reverse the car gingerly out of the parking space and I feel as if EVERYONE is looking at me (which is weird, because usually I like to be inconspicuous. Guess I’ll have to get used to it.) Go for the brakes at the junction and stop very abruptly - forgot about those Audi brakes being soooo sharp. Tootle off up the road through Carlisle and out into open country. I notice that selecting gears is a bit "stiff" for want of a better word, but this car has only covered 140 miles and I guess this will ease with use.<p>Low speed driving is fine, with none of this "jerkiness" to the throttle that I have read about, and I suddenly realise that the accelerator pedal doesn’t feel weird at all. It’s strange to think that there’s no mechanical linkage yet it feels like there is! There is little sensation of speed and 60 mph on minor roads feels like a walking pace. Ride is very good and comfortable - very similar to my Corrado but with a little more pitching due to the shorter wheelbase. Very little body roll at normal speeds - Top Gear magazine wrote about the Car as if it was a boat. I never noticed the transmission redirecting the power anywhere, even through fast uphill and downhill bends. The car just felt rock solid all the time and never in danger of doing anything unexpected. If I didn’t know I would have said the car was normally aspirated - no sign of turbo lag, whistle, anything.<p>Pedal spacing is a bit odd and will take some getting used to. Heel and toeing on down changes was tricky, but I think if I change my technique a bit it will be OK.<p>So far so good. Now for the disappointment. The 180 engine is too dull for my liking. The exhaust note doesn’t really exist in any form other than a bit of a roar, and I will miss that V6 shriek as the revs rise. The 180 Quattro really is under powered - period. I appreciate that some of this is due to the car being brand new, and there is a lessened sense of acceleration due to the flat torque curve, but for me the car really needs the 225 engine. This is a real bummer in the UK because we don’t have the choice of the FWD version which I suspect would be quicker without the extra weight and drag on the transmission.<p>One interesting point - in the UK a 180 Quattro to the same spec as a 225 Quattro is only 1200 GBP cheaper. Something to bear in mind.<p>Hope this has been informative and sparks off a bit of lively debate!<br>Paul.<br>