Article on alleged high speed instability finally showed up in Chicago Tribune.
Ironically, they also ran an article titled "Todays lighter, faster cars more dangerous experts say." that was reprinted from the Boston Globe. Seems to support the driver error theory. Link following.
-Brent<ul><li><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/marketplaces/transportation/printedition/article/0,2669,SAV-0003050106,FF.html">http://www.chicagotribune.com/marketplaces/transportation/printedition/article/0,2669,SAV-0003050106,FF.html</a</li></ul>
Ok, enough ranting and raving.
For the US readers - Join the National Motorist Association (NMA) and help put an end to this!

Seriously, it really gets me revved the wrong way. From what are they basing their assumption about newer cars being lighter/faster? I agree that they are somewhat faster *on average*, but compared to a car of its size from, say, 1990, the TT is heavy -- 3150 pounds? My parents' beater 79 Cutlass Cruiser Wagon weights 3300.
Once again I, owning another car that is eight years older, 400 pounds lighter, considerably more powerful, and *FAR* less stable at the limit than the TTQ, am left shaking my head.



