Going in for an alignment tomorrow. Lets discuss some choices >>>

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 28, 2007 | 05:41 AM

DerTT

Thread Starter

AudiWorld Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,200

Likes: 0

Going in for an alignment tomorrow. Lets discuss some choices >>>

I looked through the search and the consensus seems to be about a -1 degree (or a bit less) camber up front and an even toe (caster I believe is fixed on our cars); and about -1.5 degree camber in the back with a bit toe in.

Now here is my question- most alignment specs are for a 225 TT which is much better balanced than a 3.2TT. I currently have a 22mm rear sway and a blue Haldex controller and the car still seems to understeer at the limit (off throttle can induce a bit of rotation).

I do have the full KMAC kit in the rear ...

So how should I alter the alignment to get more neutral to mild oversteer handling? The shop asked me to get the specs I want ...

Sep 28, 2007 | 06:37 AM

DasTT

AudiWorld Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 659

Likes: 0

From: Boise, Idaho

Umm... what you describe is oversteer -->

If you can get the back end to rotate around when lifting, that's oversteering.

Also, no difference in spec for 1.8 vs 3.2, your numbers are what most strive for. In a lowered car, -1 degree camber in the front is hard to do, you may have to live with a little more negative camber, even with moving the subframe.

Sep 28, 2007 | 07:16 AM

Russ Scott

AudiWorld Super User

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 2,082

Likes: 0

Agree... that spec is optimum

There's no more to be had from alignment... More grip in the front tires or a futher increase in rear roll stiffness will extend the limit. Also reducing camber change at the front is important. Defcon 1+ if you don't have it now... works well. Camber plates replacing the upper strut bushing are the next step, but some find their ride harshness unacceptable in daily use...