Should I change my S3 with an RS3? Help...
Nevertheless all of a sudden I feel the need to upgrade to a new RS3 Sportback.
Am I crazy or would that be a good move?
Thanks for your feedback!
I come from a much more powerful car that I used as a DD and am now getting an S3 instead for a couple of reasons which might resonate or not:
-I get frustrated driving powerful cars at normal speeds (the alternative is cumulating a lot of speeding fines). Feels like their engines need to be revved.
-more powerful cars have limits you will never reach outside of a track and are therefore less fun for spirited (responsible) drives on streets.
-you never relax cruising in a very powerful car and cruising is sometimes part of DD.
Not sure if the RS3 has the same characteristics as the S3 but I fell in love with the dual personality of the S3 which makes it eventually the ultimate DD if you like sporty cars and need 4 seats.
Last edited by twoesfour; Sep 23, 2017 at 05:25 PM.
Trending Topics
Last edited by MuRaN0Daddy; Sep 23, 2017 at 01:34 PM. Reason: Spelling
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
I couldn't handle 'Comfort' - Hwy 1 through Surrey/Langley/etc would wallow and slowly bounce around like a 1980's American Car; you can probably tell I lived in Dynamic. But having a computer in control of the shock setup just frustrated me, it wasn't completely consistent - and I freaked a few times in a fast sweeper, in Dynamic, with the back-end hitting a bump. The front-end was firm enough but the back-end was much too soft, imo, to try and balance out the ride. back seat passengers would complain sometimes of nausea from the motion. Also felt like the shocks were too soft, or too firm for the springs - each setting being a compromise.
The RS3, with the fixed suspension, doesn't suffer from any of those challenges - it's consistent and much more confidence inspiring. I can drive the front end of the car and the back end around a corner. My first thoughts were it was a mid-setting between Comfort and Dynamic, now I'm not so sure - it's different overall. I've taken my wife and mother-in-law to Kelowna and back with no suspension complaints (apparently passing an RCMP SUV up the Coq is frowned upon though). Also feels like there's more suspension travel. While I'm sure the Mag setup in the RS3 is very good, I'm good with what I've got. besides, Audi Canada said it's better by giving me the 280km/h top-end and charged me more for the word 'sport'. The UK market pays extra for the Mag Suspension, and considers the fixed suspension the base offering.
I couldn't handle 'Comfort' - Hwy 1 through Surrey/Langley/etc would wallow and slowly bounce around like a 1980's American Car; you can probably tell I lived in Dynamic. But having a computer in control of the shock setup just frustrated me, it wasn't completely consistent - and I freaked a few times in a fast sweeper, in Dynamic, with the back-end hitting a bump. The front-end was firm enough but the back-end was much too soft, imo, to try and balance out the ride. back seat passengers would complain sometimes of nausea from the motion. Also felt like the shocks were too soft, or too firm for the springs - each setting being a compromise.
The RS3, with the fixed suspension, doesn't suffer from any of those challenges - it's consistent and much more confidence inspiring. I can drive the front end of the car and the back end around a corner. My first thoughts were it was a mid-setting between Comfort and Dynamic, now I'm not so sure - it's different overall. I've taken my wife and mother-in-law to Kelowna and back with no suspension complaints (apparently passing an RCMP SUV up the Coq is frowned upon though). Also feels like there's more suspension travel. While I'm sure the Mag setup in the RS3 is very good, I'm good with what I've got. besides, Audi Canada said it's better by giving me the 280km/h top-end and charged me more for the word 'sport'. The UK market pays extra for the Mag Suspension, and considers the fixed suspension the base offering.



