Comparing an S03 level tire to a Ecsta712/FM901 level tire
When my tire purchase need comes time, I'd like to know why Ishould choose one level of tire over the other.
I live in central, FL. So there's no snow on the roads ever. Worst weather conditions are rain, so wet traction is high on the list of needs. Beyond that, good dry traction would be the only other major requirement. Sandy/dusty roads I usually am not driving on.
I have 16" rims now, but will be likely going to a 17/18" rim when I need new tires.
I don't autox/drag the car, and don't plan to. I've got quattro so I like to take advantage of it's abilities occasionaly, but not very frequently as the roads that I tend to drive just don't allow it.
So given the situations, why would I want the ultra high performance top of the line over a lesser performance tire, or vice versa.
I live in Houston, Texas, so weather conditions are similar to what you face in Florida.
I've never had the SO-3, but I'd say the Pilot Sport is in the same class as the SO-3.
I'll go with the FM901 again and use the money I save for something else.
Hope that helps,
PeteH
All/most summer tires are good (or about the same) in the dry. But only a few are just as good in the wet. This is what sets S-03 apart from the lower-end of the market, like Ecsta 712.
Is it worth the extra $$$? Hard to say, really. If it can save your life, you can't put a price on it. "If."
BTW, the FM901 is getting pretty good reviews so far. I'd choose it over Ecsta 712. I like the tread pattern much better, too ;-)



