Help solve an argument about understeer and possible solutions.
On an AMG/C32 forum, someone has suggested reducing rear contact patch as a solution. My argument is that reducing traction may cause the rear slip angle to increase at lower speeds, so there will be the perception of balance, but to get the balance, you are at the same or even lower speed in the corner. So, the understeering car driven at the limit (little or no understeer) will have the same entry/exit speed as the car with narrower rear tires.
Can you improve TIME (not feel or balance) by reducing traction at the rear? If the answer is "no" then can the same argument be made regarding a firmer rear stabilizer bar (it may increase rotation, but solely by robbing traction from the rear end).
are the tires staggered F/R to begin with?
what happens if you reduce the corner entry speed to the point where there's no understeer, and then get on the gas once the car is turned most of the way? Can you put the power down?
absolute grip is only part of the game; if you can't get the car rotated, you're not going to be able to get on the gas early in the corner at that entry speed. For a momentum car, this is a bad thing. There's a reason momentum RWD cars almost always run the same tire size F/R.
But on a RWD car with tons of power, the understeer might just be telling you to back off the entry speed a bit so you can get the car turned and on the throttle earlier. And in that case, you'd probably the wider rear tires to put the power down.
Between the setup and driving style there are tons of variables....
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/17157/tiregrip.jpg">




