S4 (B8 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B8 Audi S4 produced from 2009-2016

Dyno Result

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2014, 03:06 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Newcomer
Thread Starter
 
t20ary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno Result

Very Happy

Cars totally standard no mods, 32000 miles on the clock 2011





Old 06-30-2014, 08:03 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
primetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,279
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

LOL at dyno #'s... Horrible scaling on this one... Estimated crank #'s... Just lol... Glad you're happy though... Oh and welcome to AW...
Old 06-30-2014, 08:14 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Member
 
slasher016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by primetime
LOL at dyno #'s... Horrible scaling on this one... Estimated crank #'s... Just lol... Glad you're happy though... Oh and welcome to AW...
I'm wondering what the point of this rant is?
Old 06-30-2014, 11:14 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Newcomer
Thread Starter
 
t20ary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by primetime
LOL at dyno #'s... Horrible scaling on this one... Estimated crank #'s... Just lol... Glad you're happy though... Oh and welcome to AW...
so your saying the numbers are wrong?
Old 06-30-2014, 01:12 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Member
 
SpeedTriplemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by t20ary
so your saying the numbers are wrong?
stock 2011 here too. Thanx for posting.
Old 07-01-2014, 06:17 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Member
 
slasher016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by t20ary
so your saying the numbers are wrong?
These numbers seem pretty consistent to other dynos I've seen. It continues to support the widely known belief (fact?) that Audi intentionally underrated the HP on this engine.
Old 07-01-2014, 08:24 AM
  #7  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
Joe85STi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slasher016
These numbers seem pretty consistent to other dynos I've seen. It continues to support the widely known belief (fact?) that Audi intentionally underrated the HP on this engine.
These numbers are very much too high and not even close to any other numbers I've seen which are usually in the 290-310 range. Remember, dyno numbers are power to the wheels (BHP), whereas the numbers audi publish (333hp) is at the crank. You should expect somewhere between a 15-20% loss in the drivetrain so if audi didn't underrate, you should expect no more than 284hp at the wheels. This dyno is either not calibrated correctly (very easy to do) or he did his pulls in the wrong gear (should be 4th). These numbers would indicate audi underrated by around 100hp which is ridiculous where as the usual dynos that show around 290 would indicate an underrating of around 30hp (reasonable). I would love to think that our cars are making 350hp at the wheels from the factory, but that's simply not the case. 1/4 mile times also back this.

Last edited by Joe85STi; 07-01-2014 at 08:28 AM.
Old 07-01-2014, 09:06 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
slasher016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe85STi
These numbers are very much too high and not even close to any other numbers I've seen which are usually in the 290-310 range. Remember, dyno numbers are power to the wheels (BHP), whereas the numbers audi publish (333hp) is at the crank. You should expect somewhere between a 15-20% loss in the drivetrain so if audi didn't underrate, you should expect no more than 284hp at the wheels. This dyno is either not calibrated correctly (very easy to do) or he did his pulls in the wrong gear (should be 4th). These numbers would indicate audi underrated by around 100hp which is ridiculous where as the usual dynos that show around 290 would indicate an underrating of around 30hp (reasonable). I would love to think that our cars are making 350hp at the wheels from the factory, but that's simply not the case. 1/4 mile times also back this.
You're reading the dyno sheet wrong. The wheel hp on that dyno is 292.9, and the estimated crank is 354.4, which is consistent (actually a little lower) than I've seen. His result is with an estimated 17.3% loss.

Last edited by slasher016; 07-01-2014 at 09:10 AM.
Old 07-01-2014, 10:45 AM
  #9  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
Joe85STi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slasher016
You're reading the dyno sheet wrong. The wheel hp on that dyno is 292.9, and the estimated crank is 354.4, which is consistent (actually a little lower) than I've seen. His result is with an estimated 17.3% loss.
Oh ok, hadn't noticed that. My apologies.
Old 07-01-2014, 11:22 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Member
 
RickFLS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure I understand the data either. If the graph is showing crank and the table below is showing data at the wheels, is the data saying there is 334-374 ft. lbs. of torque at the wheels? How is that reflected in the graph? It looks like the HP is adjusted in the graph vs. table below but the torque is not. Seems like an awful lot of torque for an S4... Maybe I'm just confused.


Quick Reply: Dyno Result



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.