What is up with these intercoolers?
03-08-2008, 09:55 PM
#22
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These are not IPP intercoolers. I haven't heard of anyone running these.
Anything that doesn't have a plastic end tank is better than stock IMHO. I will go with ERs when I am ready though.
03-08-2008, 10:06 PM
#23
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More charge rows than the IPPs. The IPPs would be great if they used a core with more charge rows
per inch. It is a balance between more charge rows for more efficiency (and other factors), and pressure drop. The more rows per inch, the higher the pressure drop .The ERs seem to have the perfect balance between effenciency and pressure drop. Front mounts are really effective because the longer straight air passages and surface area.
03-08-2008, 10:10 PM
#24
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am kinda curious of how effective they are. They are probably better than stock, but not the best
option available. Maybe i'll run them so everyone can flame me for not following the status quo :^)
03-09-2008, 04:09 AM
#27
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll take up that argument, why don't we first agree upon a definition for what
the 'scientific method' is, then we can debate whether that testing followed scientific procedures.
What's the definition of the scientific method?
What's the definition of the scientific method?
