Conversion from 1.8T to 2.0T
You speak of a 2.0T as if it were some standard engine. I don't think that is the case.
A total non-event. The limiting factor with the 1.8 is not the size of the motor, that is *at best* an incremental additive effect. Turbo motors can have multiplicative power increases with boost and efficiency changes.
Get a proper sized ball-bearing turbo and a FM intercooler and you will blow the doors off any 2.0 with some cobbled together design.
"Max. power 550 hp (405 kW)
Changes New E-proms in ECU, optimization of flow to intercooler, new turbo, custom built exhaust manifold, intake manifold, wastegate, intercooler, injectors, fuel pump, fuel pressure regulator, camshafts, crankshaft with increased stroke (2.0 L), piston rods, pistons, oil cooler, clutch, flywheel, air filter, modification of air filter housing and charge air hoses and pipes, extra engine mounts, modification of crank case breather, porting of cylinder head, 2 x race cats, stainless steel exhaust (turbo-back).
Note The software maintains full functionality in terms of diagnostics, engine protection and fault code memory.
Only for cars with quattro, 6-speed transmission from Audi RS2 is recommended."
I guess this car got the treatment...
<a href="http://www.audituning.com/galleri/a4_2.html">http://www.audituning.com/galleri/a4_2.html</a>
> > new driveshaft
> > new axle extension
> > new pedalbox
> > new dual master brake setup
> > new six-plate racing clutch assembly
> > new transmission
> > new engine displacement
> > new rods, pistons, cams, and crank
> > new turbo
> > new hood, front bumper, rear bumper, side skirts
> > new seats and six point harnesses
> > new roll cage system with chassis stiffening
> > new custom valved KoniSport shocks with new springs
> > new instrumentation, STACK8130
> > new wheels, two 18" 8.5x18 wheelsets
> > new headlamps (Xenon)
> > new carbon fiber surfaces to replace rear seat
> > new Alcon B-Type brake calipers on 13" Coleman rotors
> > and a couple other things.
This goes along with the old adage about displacement. There are some All motor VTEC hondas I've "heard" about with B20 blocks from the CRV and VTEC heads making 230+ HP at the wheels, with considerable (for an all motor Honda) TQ. Like 160+ FT-lbs which is a lot when you rev high and don't have a lot of weight (2200 lbs Civic shell).
In the Honda drag racing scene, Lisa Kubo stroked her B18 to 2 liters and with lots of boost in a Civic ran a 9.X 1/4 mile...
The problem with stroking the HOndas is the Rod/Stroke ratio which is alreadh bad in a B18 VTEC Honda since it's already a stroked B16 VTEC motor... Going to 2 liters makes it worse.
What is the rod/stroke ratio for the Audi? It's like the opposite (undersquare?) of Honda motor and designed for TQ, right? Soooo, stroking it may yield a better rod/stroke ratio? The "ideal" ratio is supposed to be ~1.75. The Honda B16 has this ratio and can rev very high reliaby. One mod is to take the B20 CRV motor (2 liters) and put the crank from the B17 in there to DESTROKE the motor, but get an almost ideal rod/stroke ratio...
Anyway, how does this relate to Audi engine specs? How would it affect the engines reliability, revability, rod/stroke ratio?
Doesn't APR's Stage IV kit include a 2 liter stroker kit?
Thanks,
FB
Trending Topics
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans



