![[badmoon]'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%23a0b0cd' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>[</text></svg>)
3.5 FATS is unpossible with 2+...right? Just did my first logs
Thread Starter
AudiWorld Super User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 0
3.5 FATS is unpossible with 2+...right? Just did my first logs
and one was 3.46 and the other was 3.53 on Tom P's calc. I'm sure I'm doing something wrong. Please point out the error of my ways :-) I can email them to someone if that helps. I'm such a noob at this. Computers on the seat, pushing buttons and flooring it in 3rd doesn't seem natural. Need to do more I guess. Oh, GIAC X, 91 craptane, 60 deg. and a full weight fat *** wagon on stock rims and snows. Like I said this can't be right...right?
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/60276/first_fats_log_pic.jpg">
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/60276/first_fats_calc_pic.jpg">
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/60276/first_fats_log_pic.jpg">
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/60276/first_fats_calc_pic.jpg">
Thread Starter
AudiWorld Super User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 0
It was dead flat, but would the "G 0002" mean 2nd?
From the log:
Sunday 9 April 2006 23:05:10
8D0 907 551 M 2.7l V6/5VT G 0002
That would seem right since I was flailing at the buttons trying to hit start right before I hit 4200. Do I have to be in 3rd when I hit the start button?
Sunday 9 April 2006 23:05:10
8D0 907 551 M 2.7l V6/5VT G 0002
That would seem right since I was flailing at the buttons trying to hit start right before I hit 4200. Do I have to be in 3rd when I hit the start button?
Thread Starter
AudiWorld Super User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 0
I think Chris hit it. I think the program was logging in 2nd.
Funny thing is I did'nt floor it in 2nd, and look at the throttle angle is at 100% during the Fats section. Believe me, though I've not been in a stg 3 car, I have a hard time believing this time as the car does not feel "that" fast, + the fact that I'm on 91 and a heavy avant.
Trending Topics
AudiWorld Stories
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
Top 10 Most Expensive Audis Ever Sold on Bring-A-Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Audi Features & Options We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
Audi Recreates Crazy-Looking Speed Record Breaker From 1935
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilder Recreates the 1995 Audi TTS Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Every Audi V10 Car Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
9 Audi Designs That Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
2026 Audi Q5 Buyer's Guide (Every Model Explained)
Brett Foote
Ranking Every Current Audi 'S' Model From Worst to First!
Joe Kucinski
10 Best Audis That are FINALLY LEGAL to Import to the U.S.!
Joe Kucinski
AudiWorld Super User
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 0
I concur with the 2nd gear theory. Looking at the rpm/sec, which usually
matches pretty well with acceleration, you're peaking around 5000-5500 rpm. Kind of unusual since most plots I've seen show max acceleration around max torque, and that typically occurs at a slightly lower rpm. I doubt the K03's make maximum torque at that high of an rpm.