Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz "are the worst automakers overall in reliability
Ours previous Volvo XC90 had multiple problems, one of them never fixed in 4 years of ownership, Q5 needed both sides DRL modules so far (1 y.old)
Also, when paying more money, I will demand everything to be "perfect", and I will "cope" w/ some minor problems in a "basic" vehicle...
https://www.audiworld.com/forums/sho...02&postcount=1
Also, when paying more money, I will demand everything to be "perfect", and I will "cope" w/ some minor problems in a "basic" vehicle...
Trending Topics
Also, Japanese cars generally have poor interior fit and finish and become rattle traps after a couple of years of use. Contrast that to my dad's 2002 X5, which still feels as solid as the day he drove it off the dealership lot 8 years ago.
It's funny that the myth of "japanese reliability" seems to be largely a North American invention. In Europe and Asia, German cars are not seen as less reliable than their Japanese counterparts. The problem with many of these so-called "reliability surveys" is that they don't differentiate between the various types reliability issues (i.e. a failed transmission and a rattling cup holder are given the same amount of weight in the overall reliability index calculation). Then, of course, you've the phenomenon of people demanding perfection from the more expensive cars. An Audi owner might complain about "excessive wind noise", while a Nissan driver would not even give it any thought and just assume that a certain amount of wind noise is perfectly normal.
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
Your anecdotal evidence doesn't prove consumer reports false. Just because you know someone or a few people who've had trouble with their Japanese cars doesn't make Jap cars unreliable.
If you bothered to actually read the consumer reports, you'll see that the problems that consumer reports points out in luxury cars like Audi and BMW is the unreliability of critical parts like turbo engines--not insignificant things like "rattling cup holders" that you pointed out.
Also, Japanese cars generally have poor interior fit and finish and become rattle traps after a couple of years of use. Contrast that to my dad's 2002 X5, which still feels as solid as the day he drove it off the dealership lot 8 years ago.
It's funny that the myth of "japanese reliability" seems to be largely a North American invention. In Europe and Asia, German cars are not seen as less reliable than their Japanese counterparts. The problem with many of these so-called "reliability surveys" is that they don't differentiate between the various types reliability issues (i.e. a failed transmission and a rattling cup holder are given the same amount of weight in the overall reliability index calculation). Then, of course, you've the phenomenon of people demanding perfection from the more expensive cars. An Audi owner might complain about "excessive wind noise", while a Nissan driver would not even give it any thought and just assume that a certain amount of wind noise is perfectly normal.
One other thing I have noticed is also the adaptation to the market. I have seen some european cars considered unreliable in SE Asia because... their AC was not strong enough and were getting high failure rate...Well yeah, it does not get as hot in Europe as it is year round in Singapore...
I personally do not believe that Asian cars are significantly more reliable than others. I tend to feel like they require more maintenance albeit low cost maintenance. Over 4 bimmers and 1 VW I have never had any significant problems. I've had actually more issues on my Honda civic...






