How many miles is reasonable for a dealer service department to put on a car?
Big Question: Does 81 miles road testing a car by having a technician drive it home and back sound reasonable?
Any help and/or opinion is greatly appreciated.
Rich
>>Muhammad
In some cases it is the only way they can get a shot at a problem diagnosis when the car is completely cold. In terms of number of miles driven, I guess it would depend on how far from
work the service tech lived. I'd say it was a bonus to have the tech drive the car for a couple of days. His mind is in a diagnosis mode and he might pick-up something else wrong to boot.
However, in your case!
13 cold starts seems excessive!
Mileage seems reasonable in anycase to me.
A fuse? It took 13 days to find a fuse problem?
Others are correct, sounds like you need a new
service source.
BTW, the techs *do* get special pleasure out of driving your car if it's unusual. My Subaru tech flat out told me he loved it when I brought my Legacy Turbo in because he enjoyed driving the car. Of course he seemed to love the car as much as I did, so he took good care of us. Other folks might be less caring with your baby!
Regardless, 13 days to find a fuse that COMPLETELY KILLED your power items is ridiculous. I could see 13 days for an INTERMITTENT problem which would require diagnosis and road testing, but to track down a solidly dead item is complete and total B.S. Get a new service department ASAP, or be prepared to ride close herd on these bozos.<p>Richard
'00 A6 2.7TM
Trending Topics
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
I'd bet even at your "largest Audi dealership in New England" there are far more A4's, and A6 2.8's than S4's or A6 2.7T's, so the latter are more unusual and seen less often by your techs. I find it hard to believe you'd have a $30/hr (or whatever, I don't claim to know) technician take a car out for gas instead of a $7/hr (same disclaimer) wash boy. I guess that makes sense from one standpoint, but not from a cost standpoint. It's your dealership, so I can't argue with what *you* do, but clearly not everyone does it that way.
In my opinion there's a big difference between a "joyride" as you said, and getting "special pleasure" out of driving. One implies some moron abusing your car (like my wash boy example, perhaps) the other implies the appreciation car people have for fine machinery. Do I think my Subie tech drove the car more miles than absolutely necessary? Yeah, probably. Do I think he abused the car? No way! FWIW, even the "wash boy" said he didn't abuse the cars, just drove them more miles than absolutely necessary for enjoyment.
In any case, your original posting said effectively "they wouldn't" without anything more than "just your opinion", I simply posted some ACTUAL experiences which suggest "they might".
"Lighten up, Francis!"
Oh, for your edification: a Legacy Turbo is the USA version (AWD, 2.2L 4cyl turbocharged) of the Legacy RS rally homolugation (sp?) car which was the predecessor to the Impreza WRX (you might have heard of those kicking butt in WRC?). The Legacy Turbo was sold for the 1991-1994 model years in the USA, at limited production numbers similar to that of the S4. IMNSHO, a less-than-common performance vehicle (as I said) which engendered appreciative driving from those who knew what it would do. So, no, my tech didn't "quiver with excitement" but at least he knew what he was talking about when he discussed my (former) car!<p>Richard
'00 A6 2.7TM




