W12 Owners that had a V8 before
I'm not sure why there would be a $35k difference between a 4.2 and W12 of the same model year and similar options list? Are you saying that's the additional cost for you after your 2006 4.2 trade-in?
I'm not sure why there would be a $35k difference between a 4.2 and W12 of the same model year and similar options list? Are you saying that's the additional cost for you after your 2006 4.2 trade-in?
08 W12 is loaded minus radar guided cruise and the fridge. Full leather B&O etc.
I'm not sure that I could personally swallow a 35K difference, but it certainly doesn't seem out of line from what I'm seeing online for prices.
Let us know how it shakes out.
http://www.audi.co.uk/about-audi/eve...-and-audi.html
As Modest W12 said, the equipment level of the W12 is huge. Things I would probably never buy on a new car are in there, and nice to enjoy. Having lived with both, you will have a higher gas bill. Mostly in town, where real world MPG can be down close to 10. On the freeway at reasonable speeds it is actually in the low 20's, so it's really the heavy stop and go part where you feel/see the difference. Maintenance wise, I basically have had zero issues with anything specific to the W12 motor or its auxiliary parts (extra oil and tranny coolers, two air boxes, amped up cooling system, etc.)and have owned it for 4+ years now. It has shorter major service intervals than the 4.2 (basically filters and (harder to access) plugs), but on the other hand as a chain drive motor it has no expensive timing belt recurring upkeep like the pre-FSI 4.2, nor questions about valve fouling and related performance that most FSI motors (Audi or otherwise) seem to be more prone to develop. It's a low volume motor (including the old Phaeton and the several Bentley fitments) but having followed it now for some years, I really don't think of anything it is reputed to have issues with.
Finally, owning a 10 year old 4.2 A6, well it's a nice car that I know I have maintained well, but there is nothing that special about it, and indeed most have moved on to a younger set and are getting to be "beaters." The W12 is really rare and low volume--fewer W12's are here than RS6's [before they got totalled at high rates], and about now there may even be a similar total number of R8's. I think there are likely meaningfully more W12 Bentleys than W12 A8's even. And as motors get downsized, a V8 will be even more the exception than now (newest stats are less than 20% of vehicles being sold domestically). But a W12 will be a truly rare and unique bird found otherwise pretty much in exotics. Very subjective, but having owned Audi's well past their prime years, this one may well have a halo effect for a good long time. Realistically 4.2 C and D bodies don't really seem to by out 10 years even with the great D3 qualities, and the only one in those body groups I can think of that kept some mystique years on was the C4 body S4/S6 (yes, called the S4 early on before Audi standardized platform naming) with the pumped up I-5 turbo motor, and stick based, comparatively light quattro. In common, it shared enthusiastic owners, smile on your face power and responsiveness in its time, and small total sales base, all hiding in plain site side by side with its high volume alternate motor sibling. RS6 might be another one, but it was high strung enough and with incrementally more reliability questions than the C5 that it seems muddier.
Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; Jul 28, 2011 at 09:26 PM.
Last edited by kk's woW12; Jul 29, 2011 at 01:48 PM.
Trending Topics
As Modest W12 said, the equipment level of the W12 is huge. Things I would probably never buy on a new car are in there, and nice to enjoy. Having lived with both, you will have a higher gas bill. Mostly in town, where real world MPG can be down close to 10. On the freeway at reasonable speeds it is actually in the low 20's, so it's really the heavy stop and go part where you feel/see the difference. Maintenance wise, I basically have had zero issues with anything specific to the W12 motor or its auxiliary parts (extra oil and tranny coolers, two air boxes, amped up cooling system, etc.)and have owned it for 4+ years now. It has shorter major service intervals than the 4.2 (basically filters and (harder to access) plugs), but on the other hand as a chain drive motor it has no expensive timing belt recurring upkeep like the pre-FSI 4.2, nor questions about valve fouling and related performance that most FSI motors (Audi or otherwise) seem to be more prone to develop. It's a low volume motor (including the old Phaeton and the several Bentley fitments) but having followed it now for some years, I really don't think of anything it is reputed to have issues with.
Finally, owning a 10 year old 4.2 A6, well it's a nice car that I know I have maintained well, but there is nothing that special about it, and indeed most have moved on to a younger set and are getting to be "beaters." The W12 is really rare and low volume--fewer W12's are here than RS6's [before they got totalled at high rates], and about now there may even be a similar total number of R8's. I think there are likely meaningfully more W12 Bentleys than W12 A8's even. And as motors get downsized, a V8 will be even more the exception than now (newest stats are less than 20% of vehicles being sold domestically). But a W12 will be a truly rare and unique bird found otherwise pretty much in exotics. Very subjective, but having owned Audi's well past their prime years, this one may well have a halo effect for a good long time. Realistically 4.2 C and D bodies don't really seem to by out 10 years even with the great D3 qualities, and the only one in those body groups I can think of that kept some mystique years on was the C4 body S4/S6 (yes, called the S4 early on before Audi standardized platform naming) with the pumped up I-5 turbo motor, and stick based, comparatively light quattro. In common, it shared enthusiastic owners, smile on your face power and responsiveness in its time, and small total sales base, all hiding in plain site side by side with its high volume alternate motor sibling. RS6 might be another one, but it was high strung enough and with incrementally more reliability questions than the C5 that it seems muddier.
I want to buy audi a8 w12 long Year 2005.
My questions:
Do I have to fuel 98 octane? Or 95? Will there be damage?
Is it possible to replace a smaller prevent? 4.2 liter or 3.2 liter?
Timing when to replace strap?
You can get the list of necessary treatments by miles and their costs?
Thank you
Raziel ah
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans









