Nokian Hakka 5 or Hakka R
Regardless of the brand, when studs are available for a tire, is it a waste to get them if you aren't likely to encounter conditions where studs would be needed?
Does anyone have any experience with the Hakka R? How does it perform on icy roads?
Most of my driving will be in and around Columbus, OH and I don't see myself going on any long road trips in the winter where I might encounter situations where studs would be appropriate. Secondly, I do drive to Detroit to visit friends and family. Studs are not allowed in that part of Michigan.
However, if I were buying a winter tire now, I'd be choosing between the General Altimax Arctic (rebranded Gislaved Nordfrost3), or the Hankook iPike w409. Both fall into the same category as the hakkas, but for considerably less $$ than Nokians cost now with the weak dollar. They might not perform quite as well as the Nokian.. but 90% of the performance for nearly half the price is something I can handle. :-)
I currently have the Dunlop M3, Dunlop D2S on 18's and like the dry handling of the M3 and the slush handling of the M3, but find the D2S much better in deep snow, ice and packed snow. But the d2S being so soft wears so quick and handles so-so.
On the other car we ran the old Blizzak ws-50 and it was great all around except for handling. We now have the Blizzak revo and for her driving style and the days she actually drives the car in the snow they work great.
I was looking at the WGR2's for a good all arounder for me, but maybe the hakka 5 w/ out studs would be better.
I don't purchase tires from Hankook anymore. And the Nordfrost/Generals don't come in 18's.
Trending Topics
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans


