TT vs TTS without mods (not chipped)
Mine was located across the country when I bought it, and with the weather turning nasty across a number of states (hail storms and such) it took two weeks to get here.
Longest two weeks of my life...
Is there a source that compares the 3.2 and the 2.0's thru the speed ranges?
I have a 3.2 and enjoy the smoothness...[and can live with the fact that even though is was more costly and has greater displacement , may not be as fast in certain ranges]....but I'd find it interesting to see the acceleration differences in an apples to apples comparison [by the same tester/track/methodology/day/conditions etc]. Otherwise it is pretty near impossible to make valid comparisons.
thanks
mike
http://forums.quattroworld.com/tt2/msgs/18223.phtml
Might want to stick with stasis, suspect they have pressured AOA to this. AudiZine and Quattroworld forums have owners claiming that warranty coverage has been denied due chipping
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
http://forums.quattroworld.com/tt2/msgs/18223.phtml
...doesn't mention any exceptions for Stasis. Are you sure it doesn't void the warranty?
http://forums.quattroworld.com/tt2/msgs/18223.phtml
...doesn't mention any exceptions for Stasis. Are you sure it doesn't void the warranty?
That said, this seems like a recipe for finger pointing to me - if, for example, the brakes fail, and Audi says they won't pay because the car had more power than spec and the brakes were being abused, is Stasis really going to pay for brakes (i.e., if Audi is being unreasonable - who gets screwed, Stasis or the customer)?
Given how Audi dealt with me on a warranty issue, I would imagine they leap to deny coverage for anything and everything based on this, and Stasis may pay for some things, but I have trouble imagining them paying for the full range of things Audi might say are connected to the engine being significantly beyond spec power.





