Ready to change my upper control arms
#31
AudiWorld Super User
I expect another 40k miles out of them. And on Chicago roads that's good going. That's what the set I just replaced managed according to its service records, and they were only just starting to go.
I know we moan about them and why can't Audi fix them, blah blah blah. But they're not particularly difficult or expensive to fix. I'd rather these get sacrificed to wear out sooner rather than some other more expensive components which is what would happen if the upper bushings were more durable. This is because the other suspension components would then be subjected to greater loads.
I don't for a second think that Audi can't figure out a more durable design. I think it's intentional and it's no coincidence that it still affects the D4 and other newer Audi models with the same general suspension design. Sure they could put tougher more durable bushings in that last 100k miles, but then we'd all be up in arms about cracked suspension pickup points ala BMW M3, or some other much more serious to fix issue.
I know we moan about them and why can't Audi fix them, blah blah blah. But they're not particularly difficult or expensive to fix. I'd rather these get sacrificed to wear out sooner rather than some other more expensive components which is what would happen if the upper bushings were more durable. This is because the other suspension components would then be subjected to greater loads.
I don't for a second think that Audi can't figure out a more durable design. I think it's intentional and it's no coincidence that it still affects the D4 and other newer Audi models with the same general suspension design. Sure they could put tougher more durable bushings in that last 100k miles, but then we'd all be up in arms about cracked suspension pickup points ala BMW M3, or some other much more serious to fix issue.
#32
AudiWorld Wiseguy
And it's not as if other large heavy cars don't suffer from bushing wear in a similar manner. Both my Dad's w211 and w212 e-class's have had a healthy appetite for bushings no better than the A8. It's just that we tend to think it's a problem that only affects A8's as that's all we read about on the forums. Other Marques usually have similar issues, it's just we're generally not exposing ourselves to that information on a regular basis.
Last edited by dvs_dave; 05-06-2016 at 04:10 PM.
#33
AudiWorld Super User
All I can add is I am trying the S8 bushings/arms that are somehow different in their composition, at least supposedly. In 40-50K I may have a further practical answer, if I know where car is by then. Also FWIW, when you play with the bushings and arms in place, you realize they actually do need--or at least seem designed--to move in all three dimensions, so pretty complicated.
#34
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Moronville, Tennessee (Middle TN)
Posts: 2,223
Received 83 Likes
on
69 Posts
What I don't fully understand is why the torsional force on the rubber is necessary? Why can't the bushings just pivot on the bolts? I thought the dampers/airsprings/tire flex were in charge of up-n-down changes?
I see why the rubber can be used as it is, but it seems there'd be a much better way.
I see why the rubber can be used as it is, but it seems there'd be a much better way.
#35
AudiWorld Super User
What I don't fully understand is why the torsional force on the rubber is necessary? Why can't the bushings just pivot on the bolts? I thought the dampers/airsprings/tire flex were in charge of up-n-down changes?
I see why the rubber can be used as it is, but it seems there'd be a much better way.
I see why the rubber can be used as it is, but it seems there'd be a much better way.
Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; 05-06-2016 at 07:59 PM.
#36
AudiWorld Super User
What I don't fully understand is why the torsional force on the rubber is necessary? Why can't the bushings just pivot on the bolts? I thought the dampers/airsprings/tire flex were in charge of up-n-down changes?
I see why the rubber can be used as it is, but it seems there'd be a much better way.
I see why the rubber can be used as it is, but it seems there'd be a much better way.
#38
AudiWorld Super User
I'll go w/ Misha here notionally. The design is from a late 90's A4, that then migrated to D2 A8. D3 and D2 are basically same except air ride strut in front, or at least same in turn as my C5 4.2 which was apparently a D2 copy when they stuffed the 4.2 in the A6. Trouble was, wheel and tire weight on an A4 of the era was like 40 pounds, and brake rotor maybe 15. Make it 45 ish on a D2 and 20 on the brake rotors. Then pork it up to 50-60 on a D3 for the wheels and take the brake rotors to 30-40 depending on motor, and oops. They switched from cast iron calipers to alloy ones, but then got the way heavy cast iron bracket to go with it. Even over the life of the D3, these various wheel and brake diameters were sized up, yet suspension components not revisited. Said bluntly, poor ongoing design and sustaining engineering management.
And BTW, pattern continues on D4. Yet more wheel pork. Across most all Audis these days. They did offset it a bit with the quasi two piece rotors up front on the D4 and other larger brake ones, which in turn cost like 3x the $ of the standard cast ones. Virtually no aftermarket ones either--as the higher volume SQ5 owners who got the parts bin brake specials from the A8 3.0T are starting to find out at like $500 a rotor.
In general, the D's need a serious weight reduction--500+ pounds these days, maybe more. Run away HP has cloaked it, but they have gotten really porky even with our aluminum bodies. The suspension bushings are sort of the canary in the coal mine signaling something.
And BTW, pattern continues on D4. Yet more wheel pork. Across most all Audis these days. They did offset it a bit with the quasi two piece rotors up front on the D4 and other larger brake ones, which in turn cost like 3x the $ of the standard cast ones. Virtually no aftermarket ones either--as the higher volume SQ5 owners who got the parts bin brake specials from the A8 3.0T are starting to find out at like $500 a rotor.
In general, the D's need a serious weight reduction--500+ pounds these days, maybe more. Run away HP has cloaked it, but they have gotten really porky even with our aluminum bodies. The suspension bushings are sort of the canary in the coal mine signaling something.
Last edited by MP4.2+6.0; 05-07-2016 at 03:51 PM.
#39
AudiWorld Super User
In 2001, the S8 weighed in at just over 4000lbs. Today's model weighs 600lbs more. MP4.2 is right, these things have pulled a full Oprah, compensating for the extra poundage with more power than ever.