A4 (B8 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B8 Audi A4 produced from 2008.5

Audi=Volkswagen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2011, 11:19 AM
  #31  
AudiWorld Member
 
QUA77R0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnny ro
The CC is the better looking car with better looking and better laid out cockpit.
It might look nice but having driven one quite a bit, I gotta say that the rear blind spots created by the C-pillar are absurd.



To the OP, next time someone says something stupid about your A4 being a glorified Passat, smile and remind him that Ferrari is actually a glorified Fiat. I can post that here... on the Ferrari forums.... they'd probably band together and plant a flaming Fiat in my yard some night....

It's all relative.

Last edited by QUA77R0; 06-04-2011 at 11:22 AM.
Old 06-04-2011, 12:42 PM
  #32  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Moviela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This is just like the people who argue if David Lee Roth or Sammy Hagar doing vocals is the REAL Van Halen.

Audi, Seat, Skoda, & VW market to different car buyers. When people compare Audi to VW I simply remind them that Porsche came from VW too.
Old 06-04-2011, 02:11 PM
  #33  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
Carl E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wonder why some people even care to make the comment...I dare bet that each time an A4 passes by, the Passat owner looks long and hard after it and have a tiny feeling of desire and not quite beeing 100% satisfied with his car, hence the reason to start to rationalize the choice with comments of this kind..Each to his own..

..Our Passat Wagon is the perfect 2nd car, functional and all, but it lacks the solid and satisfying feeling of the A4.
Old 06-05-2011, 12:54 PM
  #34  
AudiWorld Super User
 
av_audi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quality_sound
I kknow with this being an Audi site people are going to want to justify their purchases but the simple fact is that VWs and Audis have much more in common than most "enthusiasts" want to admit.
Similarly loaded Passats and A4s were not too far off in price. The difference was that you could get a modestly equipped base Passat, whereas that hasn't been an option for the A4 in quite a while. Take a Premium A4, remove quattro, leather, sunroof, alloys, leather wrapped multi-function steering, power seats, etc., and you quickly get to the mid twenties price point, if not lower.

And before the B6 Passat got shriveled to a single trim, you could go the other way with the Passat, loading it up to well over $35K, and even higher with the short-lived W8 engine.
Old 06-05-2011, 12:56 PM
  #35  
AudiWorld Member
 
quality_sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gunsmoker
That's true about Nissan/Infinity and Honda/Accura. Lexus is Lexus around the world nowadays.

There is nothing wrong with brands having low-end and high-end offerings. It's the word "glorified" that is the problem for me.
There will always be parts sharing. The key is what the overall package delivers.
I was shopping for a sedan 4 years ago and at that time the last gen Passat looked very appealing to me from a price and looks standpoint until I drove one. I was extremely disappointed. The interior looked very low quality - those gray dotted plasticy inlays and that key fob with with visible seams from the plastic molding - ugh. Too much body roll in the corners... Totally disappointed. The Jetta's interior was better at that time (the new Jetta is a total disappointment though).
I bought an IS250 for my wife back then. There was no comparison between the two and yeah, there was a $10k difference. Now I have a 2011 A4 and the price of it is 3k higher than that of the IS250, but it's so much better that I'd never ever buy a Lexus again. The mpg is 10% better, there is less noise in the cabin, it's more spacious, it's 2s faster 0-60, the fit and finish is perfect (2mm gaps in the Lexus at places), the stability system actually works in the snow, the potholes are less noticeable...
The point is that in the offerings of every manufacturer, different price points mean different quality and performance. It's also true that there is an inflection point, beyond which the price hardly justifies what you get. That inflection point depends on the shopper to a large extent and if they can't tell leather from leatherette, don't notice gaps between the panels, noise, handling issues, etc., that inflection point is very low to them.
I agree, the newer VWs have come down in interior quality. I guess it had to at some point since the quality of VW up until this gen HAD to be stealing sales from Audi. I know when I owned both of my Passats, both of my Jettas, my Rabbit, and my GTI there was nothing other than Quattro to justify the price difference. Interior quality was even at best, exterior quality was even, drivetrains are the same, and since I was living in CA Quattro was unnecessary. Now, I totally agree that there is a NOTICEABLE difference in build quality, drive quality, and parts used. The price difference is now justified, IMO.

I'm with you on the quality of Lexus products. If I wasn't going to buy German I'd most likely look at Korean cars. Hyundai and Kia are building VASTLY superior cars to what they had in the past and I'd even take them over anything else from Japan or America other than Ford (I NEVER thought I'd say that).
Old 06-05-2011, 02:51 PM
  #36  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JD15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,979
Received 541 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quality_sound
I agree, the newer VWs have come down in interior quality. I guess it had to at some point since the quality of VW up until this gen HAD to be stealing sales from Audi.
More than that, VW wants to substantially increase sales in the US by introducing new models that match, or even undercut, the price point of competition from companies like Hyundai, Toyota and Honda. Given the impressive sales of the new Jetta, many consumers don't seem to mind the solid rear axle, hard interior plastics, and drum brakes.
Old 06-05-2011, 03:58 PM
  #37  
AudiWorld Super User
 
av_audi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD15
More than that, VW wants to substantially increase sales in the US by introducing new models that match, or even undercut, the price point of competition from companies like Hyundai, Toyota and Honda. Given the impressive sales of the new Jetta, many consumers don't seem to mind the solid rear axle, hard interior plastics, and drum brakes.
I have always thought that a good portion of Jetta buyers were in it for nothing but the "cool factor." For the niche enthusiasts, however, the new Jetta must be a huge disappointment. It's not just the fact that it has the things you mention above (including lower grade steering rack), its handling has apparently become lousy.

Last edited by av_audi; 06-06-2011 at 11:12 AM. Reason: typo
Old 06-06-2011, 03:17 AM
  #38  
AudiWorld Member
 
Sundowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quality_sound
Some of the examples you guys use are a bit off. Lexus is only Lexus in America and I think Germany. Everywhere else ALL Toyotas and Lexuses are Toyotas. Same for Nissan/Infiniti, Honda/Acura. It's badge engineering, nothing more.

Up until this year, the Passat/CC/A4 DID share a common platform and calling an A4 a glorified Passat/CC was not far off the mark. .
Not untrue, but as a clarification, the B6 Passat and CC share the same platform as the golf, jetta, and A3, not the A4. The B5 platform did sahre with the A4 but the Passat/CC were moved to the golf platform in 2006. I actually had a 2008 Passat, and I'll stand behind it as one of the best cars I ever owned, but it definitely shared it's hardware with the Golf.
Old 06-06-2011, 03:22 AM
  #39  
AudiWorld Member
 
Sundowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD15
More than that, VW wants to substantially increase sales in the US by introducing new models that match, or even undercut, the price point of competition from companies like Hyundai, Toyota and Honda. Given the impressive sales of the new Jetta, many consumers don't seem to mind the solid rear axle, hard interior plastics, and drum brakes.
there is an argument that VW gets into trouble when they get ambitious with gadget designs, and some of the best products they've made were the simplier ones. I would like to give VW the benefit of the doubt that they are getting back to those roots. If VW can build a solid axle drum brake'd car for less and to better standards, then that's arguably good for everyone. I'd like to think that the people most upset by the downgrade are ones who would have been happier in an entry level premium vehicle, anyway. A lower lever A3, for example, is close enough in price and trim to an upper level GTI that someone could concievably cross-shop them.
Old 06-06-2011, 03:50 PM
  #40  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Old Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal, Que. (Canada)
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Gee funny, four days have passed, four pages and 40 posts later and not a peep from the OP on "Are Audis glorified VW's" . It has led to some interesting discussions that he may be missing out on.


Quick Reply: Audi=Volkswagen



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 AM.