engine replacement
Trending Topics
Not positive, but I'm not aware of any requirement for a seller to disclose to a purchaser mechanical repairs - only known accidents or safety issues/items that are in need of repair. In this case, it's a mechanical "repair". If the seller had replaced defective brakes, shocks or a trunk lock, would it be required they disclose this? Doubtful. While the engine replacement would certainly be a major event, it's still a mechanical repair.
While I would ask why the engine was replaced, if the car is performing properly, I would think that the new engine is a plus, not a negative. I seriously doubt that an engine that was 35K mi newer than the rest of the car would hurt a resale - it actually would probably be a plus to a potential buyer down the road as it's the most expensive "component" of the car to replace or rebuild in later years.
Finally, if you were to initiate an action against the dealer for non-disclosure, I would think it would be difficult for a judge or jury to award any damages to the new owner as a result of receiving a new $20K engine. If the car was sold to you in need of a new engine and that was not disclosed, that's a different story.
As for Carfax, I think it's a utter waste of money for a dealer to subscribe to or a purchaser to rely on it. Any used car purchaser should have an independent party examine the car before signing a contract and if available, repair records be presented.
So, yes, the dealer should have made you aware of this major repair event before you purchased the car but, in the end, was probably was not required to do so. In any case, particularly if you have a warranty, I wouldn't worry about it. Enjoy the car.
Bringing Audi to Life for Audi Fans
Not positive, but I'm not aware of any requirement for a seller to disclose to a purchaser mechanical repairs - only known accidents or safety issues/items that are in need of repair. In this case, it's a mechanical "repair". If the seller had replaced defective brakes, shocks or a trunk lock, would it be required they disclose this? Doubtful. While the engine replacement would certainly be a major event, it's still a mechanical repair.
While I would ask why the engine was replaced, if the car is performing properly, I would think that the new engine is a plus, not a negative. I seriously doubt that an engine that was 35K mi newer than the rest of the car would hurt a resale - it actually would probably be a plus to a potential buyer down the road as it's the most expensive "component" of the car to replace or rebuild in later years.
Finally, if you were to initiate an action against the dealer for non-disclosure, I would think it would be difficult for a judge or jury to award any damages to the new owner as a result of receiving a new $20K engine. If the car was sold to you in need of a new engine and that was not disclosed, that's a different story.
As for Carfax, I think it's a utter waste of money for a dealer to subscribe to or a purchaser to rely on it. Any used car purchaser should have an independent party examine the car before signing a contract and if available, repair records be presented.
So, yes, the dealer should have made you aware of this major repair event before you purchased the car but, in the end, was probably was not required to do so. In any case, particularly if you have a warranty, I wouldn't worry about it. Enjoy the car.
i was starting to wonder if i had been taken for a ride....and this is my dream car





