Peter L

<center><img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/AudiWorldPics/2000/jpliii4.2biturbo.jpg"></center><p>got bored so i made me something fun to dream about

original pic was my moms pearl 4.2<p>Peter L
2000 S4 Light Silver Metallic / Onyx
everything but nav. and phone.
Valentine 1 (hard wired)
LLTek eyelids
LL Tek Mud and snow mats
Clear corner mod
tinted windows 30% all around
Stratmosphere Mats
Yokohama AVS Sport 235/40 17 on sto

Bollinger

I have a 2.7T. Both are ugly. How about they clean up the design on top and then eliminate the stupid plastic covers?

Stu B

Ain't goin' to happen. Ever look under the hoods of Mercedes or BMWs? Same thing.

Bollinger

Look under the hood of a Saturn some time. Or a Cadillac Catera.

Stu B

I have never looked under those hoods, and probably never will ;-)

bzientek

have you ever looked a Ford Taurus SHO? ( the yamaha engines, before 96) these are really cool looking engines, I've seen some that were polished and were like works of art. too bad its a ford.

GB27t

Yes in fact I read an article about a proposed S6 with a 4.2 biturbo in 2001 or 2002. Again speculation but it was an actual article. If I remember the mag I will post it.<p>Greg

Ming/Melange 2.7T

Todd W

But the slop in the steering shaft is a royal PITA. A real comment on American design, considering that it was the preeminent American sports sedan at the time. At least the shifter finally loosened up after 120K.<p>Todd W

Jimmy Pribble

<center><img src="http://www.s-cars.org/s4s6/images/033.jpg"></center><p>However, I agree that there is no excuse for the current plastic cover craze. Sheesh, was the Quad4 really so great they thought they should copy it? It's just laziness.

SHO engine is beautiful.

IMHO,<p>Jimmy
www.UrS4.com