When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The Audi Computer is a bit optimistic. It’s usually about 1 mpg higher than the actual.
That's pretty close for the realm of optimistic.
Originally Posted by AMDG75
As Kevin said, it is optimistic ....by my calculations, 5-10% higher over the past nearly 5 years...straight highway: incredible !!!
Those percentages make things an eye opener when you double check the cars computer and you get the lower mileage figures than you were led to believe.
The EPA MPG numbers are identical for both models.
I realize what Audi states about the two mileages being the same...I just wondering if any owners were experiencing anything different.
UPDATE.....
Looks like my wife has expressed her liking of the SUVs, so I guess the A7 is pretty much out of the future car thing.
Guess if the Q5 seems to small it'll have to be a VW Touareg.
The Q7 is to big for our needs and wants.
Last edited by EARL99208; Apr 21, 2019 at 01:48 PM.
Best tank 37.7 mpg (hand calculated). Avg 30.7 as I enjoy all 430tq often, not babying it just for MPG. It's a great balance of both! Other green datapoints are two Q5 TDIs. We also began moving in late 2015, driving further, so MPG went up a bit there as noted in Q5s.
zoomed in:
Best tank at 701 miles:
Mine was about 5% optimistic in MPG, so I adjusted it with VAG-COM and found 106 setting got me spot on (On average. Every tank will vary):
New Audi A6 Allroad Is The Market's Coolest Wagon: 9 Things to Know
Slideshow: Audi's latest A6 Allroad gets RS-style fenders, real off-road hardware, and enough personality to stand out in a market obsessed with crossovers.
Audi Recreates Crazy-Looking Speed Record Breaker From 1935
Slideshow: Audi has recreated one of the wildest machines of the pre-war speed-record era, reviving a streamlined V16 racer that originally exceeded 200 mph in 1935.
